Department of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01853-9.
Diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTI) in nursing home residents is complex, due to frequent non-specific symptomatology and asymptomatic bacteriuria. The objective of this study was to explore health care professionals' perceptions of the proposed use of inflammatory marker Point-Of-Care Testing (POCT) in this respect.
We conducted a qualitative inquiry (2018-2019) alongside the multicenter PROGRESS study (NL6293), which assessed the sensitivity of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin POCT in UTI. We used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The participants were physicians (n = 12) and nurses (n = 6) from 13 nursing homes in the Netherlands. Most respondents were not familiar with inflammatory marker POCT, while some used POCT for respiratory tract infections. Both the interview guide and the analysis of the interview transcripts were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
All respondents acknowledged that sufficiently sensitive POCT could decrease diagnostic uncertainty to some extent in residents presenting with non-specific symptoms. They primarily thought that negative test results would rule out UTI and justify withholding antibiotic treatment. Secondly, they described how positive test results could rule in UTI and justify antimicrobial treatment. However, most respondents also expected new diagnostic uncertainties to arise. Firstly, in case of negative test results, they were not sure how to deal with residents' persisting non-specific symptoms. Secondly, in case of positive test results, they feared overlooking infections other than UTI. These new uncertainties could lead to inappropriate antibiotics use. Therefore, POCT was thought to create a false sense of confidence.
Our study suggests that inflammatory marker POCT will only improve UTI management in nursing homes to some extent. To realize the expected added value, any implementation of POCT requires thorough guidance to ensure appropriate use. Developing UTI markers with high negative and positive predictive values may offer greater potential to improve UTI management in nursing homes.
在养老院中诊断尿路感染(UTI)较为复杂,因为其常伴有非特异性症状和无症状菌尿。本研究旨在探讨医护人员对炎症标志物即时检验(POCT)在这方面应用的看法。
我们在多中心 PROGRESS 研究(NL6293)中进行了一项定性研究(2018-2019 年),该研究评估了 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原 POCT 在 UTI 中的敏感性。我们使用了半结构化的面对面访谈。参与者是来自荷兰 13 家养老院的医生(n=12)和护士(n=6)。大多数受访者对炎症标志物 POCT 不熟悉,而有些则将 POCT 用于治疗呼吸道感染。访谈指南和访谈记录的分析均基于实施研究综合框架。
所有受访者都承认,具有足够敏感性的 POCT 可在一定程度上减少出现非特异性症状的居民的诊断不确定性。他们主要认为阴性检测结果可排除 UTI,并可合理避免使用抗生素治疗。其次,他们描述了阳性检测结果如何确定 UTI,并可合理进行抗菌治疗。但是,大多数受访者也预计会出现新的诊断不确定性。首先,如果检测结果为阴性,他们不确定如何处理居民持续存在的非特异性症状。其次,如果检测结果为阳性,他们担心会忽略 UTI 以外的其他感染。这些新的不确定性可能导致不合理的抗生素使用。因此,POCT 可能会产生一种错误的信心。
我们的研究表明,炎症标志物 POCT 只能在一定程度上改善养老院的 UTI 管理。为了实现预期的附加值,POCT 的任何实施都需要彻底的指导,以确保其合理使用。开发具有高阴性和阳性预测值的 UTI 标志物可能会为改善养老院的 UTI 管理提供更大的潜力。