Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Rd, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2066, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1011. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9.
Medical tests provide important information to guide clinical management. Overtesting, however, may cause harm to patients and the healthcare system, including through misdiagnosis, false positives, false negatives and overdiagnosis. Clinicians are ultimately responsible for test requests, and are therefore ideally positioned to prevent overtesting and its unintended consequences. Through this narrative literature review and workshop discussion with experts at the Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference (Sydney, 2019), we aimed to identify and establish a thematic framework of factors that influence clinicians to request non-recommended and unnecessary tests.
Articles exploring factors affecting clinician test ordering behaviour were identified through a systematic search of MedLine in April 2019, forward and backward citation searches and content experts. Two authors screened abstract titles and abstracts, and two authors screened full text for inclusion. Identified factors were categorised into a preliminary framework which was subsequently presented at the PODC for iterative development.
The MedLine search yielded 542 articles; 55 were included. Another 10 articles identified by forward-backward citation and content experts were included, resulting in 65 articles in total. Following small group discussion with workshop participants, a revised thematic framework of factors was developed: "Intrapersonal" - fear of malpractice and litigation; clinician knowledge and understanding; intolerance of uncertainty and risk aversion; cognitive biases and experiences; sense of medical obligation "Interpersonal" - pressure from patients and doctor-patient relationship; pressure from colleagues and medical culture; "Environment/context" - guidelines, protocols and policies; financial incentives and ownership of tests; time constraints, physical vulnerabilities and language barriers; availability and ease of access to tests; pre-emptive testing to facilitate subsequent care; contemporary medical practice and new technology CONCLUSION: This thematic framework may raise awareness of overtesting and prompt clinicians to change their test request behaviour. The development of a scale to assess clinician knowledge, attitudes and practices is planned to allow evaluation of clinician-targeted interventions to reduce overtesting.
医学检测为临床管理提供了重要信息。然而,过度检测可能会对患者和医疗系统造成伤害,包括误诊、假阳性、假阴性和过度诊断。临床医生最终对检测请求负责,因此他们是预防过度检测及其不良后果的理想人选。通过对预防过度诊断会议(悉尼,2019 年)的文献综述和专家研讨会,我们旨在确定并建立一个主题框架,以了解影响临床医生请求非推荐和不必要检测的因素。
通过 2019 年 4 月在 MedLine 上进行系统搜索、向前和向后引文搜索以及内容专家,确定了探索影响临床医生检测命令行为因素的文章。两位作者筛选了标题和摘要,两位作者筛选了全文以进行纳入。确定的因素被归类为初步框架,随后在 PODC 上进行迭代开发。
MedLine 搜索产生了 542 篇文章;其中 55 篇被纳入。通过向前向后的引文和内容专家又确定了 10 篇文章,总共 65 篇文章被纳入。在与研讨会参与者进行小组讨论后,开发了一个修订后的主题框架因素:“个人” - 对医疗事故和诉讼的恐惧;临床医生的知识和理解;对不确定性和风险规避的容忍度;认知偏见和经验;医疗义务感;“人际” - 来自患者和医患关系的压力;来自同事和医疗文化的压力;“环境/背景” - 指南、协议和政策;财务激励和检测所有权;时间限制、身体脆弱性和语言障碍;检测的可用性和便利性;为方便后续护理而进行的预防性检测;当代医疗实践和新技术。
这个主题框架可能会提高对过度检测的认识,并促使临床医生改变他们的检测请求行为。计划开发一个评估临床医生知识、态度和实践的量表,以评估针对临床医生的干预措施,以减少过度检测。