Alagiriswamy Gayathree, Krishnan Chitra Shankar, Ramakrishnan Hariharan, Jayakrishnakumar Sampath Kumar, Mahadevan Vallabh, Azhagarasan Nagarasampatti Sivaprakasam
Department of Prosthodontics & Implantology, Ragas Dental College & Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S114-S123. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_39_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
Zirconia being a bio-inert material needs to be surface treated to render it more bioactive and enhance its osseointegration potential. However, bioactivity studies focusing on the ability of sandblasting and ultraviolet photofunctionalization (UVP) surface treatments in inducing apatite precipitation using simulated body fluid (SBF) are lacking.
The aim of the study was to comparatively evaluate the effect of two different surface treatments-sandblasting with 50 µm alumina and UVP with ultraviolet C (UVC) light on the bioactivity of zirconia.
A total of 33 discs with dimensions 10 mm × 2 mm were obtained from zirconia blanks (Amann Girrbach, Koblach, Austria) and randomly divided into three groups ( = 11), namely Group I (untreated), Group II (sandblasted), and Group III (UVP). Surface characteristics of representative test samples were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact angle goniometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), to assess type of crystal phase of zirconia, surface roughness, wettability, surface topography, and elemental composition, respectively. SBF was prepared and calcium content in SBF (Ca-SBF) was determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD), and Student's test for statistical significance ( < 0.05, significant; < 0.01, highly significant). Surface characteristics analyses revealed that XRD showed predominant tetragonal (t) zirconia crystal phase for all test groups. Mean surface roughness (Sa) of Group I was 41.83 nm, and it was significantly lesser than that of Group II (115.65 nm) and Group III (102.43 nm). Mean contact angles were 98.26°, 86.77°, and 68.03° for Groups I, II, and III, respectively, and these differences were highly significant. Mean pre-immersion Ca content in SBF was found to be 159 mg/L. Mean post-immersion Ca content was 70.10, 60.80, and 56.20 mg/L for Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Significant differences were found between Group I as compared to both Groups II and III. Bioactivity of Group III was marginally, but insignificantly higher with respect to Group II. Groups II and III were insignificant with respect to each other. Post-immersion XRD revealed predominant "t" phase, and SEM-EDX revealed well-formed, abundant calcium apatite layer on the treated samples as compared to that on untreated sample and an increasing Ca/P ratio from 1.15, 1.79 to 2.08, respectively from Group I to Group III.
Within the limitations of this study, both sandblasting and UVP significantly and similarly improved bioactivity of zirconia as compared to the untreated samples, which was corroborated by the SEM-EDX results.
氧化锆作为一种生物惰性材料,需要进行表面处理以使其具有更高的生物活性并增强其骨整合潜力。然而,目前缺乏针对喷砂和紫外光功能化(UVP)表面处理在使用模拟体液(SBF)诱导磷灰石沉淀方面能力的生物活性研究。
本研究的目的是比较评估两种不同表面处理——用50 µm氧化铝喷砂和用紫外C(UVC)光进行UVP处理——对氧化锆生物活性的影响。
从氧化锆坯料(阿曼·吉尔巴赫公司,奥地利科布拉克)获得33个尺寸为10 mm×2 mm的圆盘,并随机分为三组(每组n = 11),即I组(未处理)、II组(喷砂处理)和III组(UVP处理)。使用X射线衍射(XRD)、原子力显微镜(AFM)、接触角测量法、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散X射线光谱(EDX)分析代表性测试样品的表面特性,分别评估氧化锆的晶相类型、表面粗糙度、润湿性、表面形貌和元素组成。制备SBF并使用电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)测定SBF中的钙含量(Ca-SBF)。
数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、Tukey真实显著差异(HSD)检验和Student's t检验进行统计学显著性分析(P < 0.05为显著;P < 0.01为高度显著)。表面特性分析表明,XRD显示所有测试组中氧化锆主要为四方(t)晶相。I组的平均表面粗糙度(Sa)为41.83 nm,显著低于II组(115.65 nm)和III组(102.43 nm)。I组、II组和III组的平均接触角分别为98.26°、86.77°和68.03°,这些差异具有高度显著性。发现SBF中预浸泡钙含量平均为159 mg/L。I组、II组和III组浸泡后的钙含量平均值分别为70.10、60.80和56.20 mg/L。I组与II组和III组相比均存在显著差异。III组的生物活性相对于II组略高,但无统计学意义。II组和III组之间无统计学意义。浸泡后XRD显示主要为“t”相,SEM-EDX显示与未处理样品相比,处理后的样品上形成了良好、丰富的钙磷灰石层,且从I组到III组Ca/P比分别从1.15、1.79增加到2.08。
在本研究的局限性内,与未处理样品相比,喷砂和UVP处理均显著且相似地提高了氧化锆的生物活性,SEM-EDX结果证实了这一点。