Zhou Jing, Yu Yunyang, Cao Biwei, Li Xiaoya, Wu Miao, Wen Tao, Xiong Yuan, Jia Jian, Zhao Yan
First Clinical Medical College, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
Department of Tuina and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Oct 16;2020:4783915. doi: 10.1155/2020/4783915. eCollection 2020.
To date, a growing number of clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and health benefits from Baduanjin intervention. Based on this, our objective is to systematically retrieve and summarize the clinical studies on Baduanjin, with a view to providing more evidence-based evidence in support of the application of Baduanjin for healthcare, and to identify the shortcomings of existing research and provide feasibility suggest for further clinical research. Both four English language and four Chinese language electronic databases were used to search articles related to Baduanjin during 2000-2019. SPSS 22.0 software was used to analyze the data, and the risk of bias tool in the RevMan 5.3.5 software was used to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials. A total of 810 publications were identified, including 43 (5.3%) systematic reviews, 614 (75.8%) randomized controlled trials, 66 (8.1%) nonrandomized controlled clinical studies, 84 (10.4%) case series, and 3 (0.4%) case reports. The top 10 diseases/conditions included diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, low back pain, neck pain, stroke, coronary heart disease, cognitive impairment, insomnia, and osteoporosis or osteopenia. The style of State General Administration of Sport of China in 2003 was the most commonly used version of Baduanjin, and Baduanjin was practiced with an average of 35 minutes, 1 or 2 times a day, 3-5 days per week, and a 18-week average duration. It is also worth noting that there were no serious adverse events related to Baduanjin intervention. Most studies were small sample size research, and the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials is generally low. The clinical studies of Baduanjin have a substantial quantity and evidence base. However, there are significant differences among different studies in the specific intervention measures such as style, intensity, duration, learning, and practice methods, which need to be further standardized and unified. Further high-quality designed and reporting studies are recommended to further validate the clinical benefits of Baduanjin.
迄今为止,越来越多的临床研究已证明八段锦干预的安全性和健康益处。基于此,我们的目标是系统检索并总结八段锦的临床研究,以期提供更多循证依据以支持八段锦在医疗保健中的应用,并找出现有研究的不足,为进一步的临床研究提供可行性建议。我们使用了四个英文电子数据库和四个中文电子数据库来检索2000年至2019年期间与八段锦相关的文章。使用SPSS 22.0软件进行数据分析,并使用RevMan 5.3.5软件中的偏倚风险工具来评估随机对照试验的方法学质量。共识别出810篇出版物,包括43篇(5.3%)系统评价、614篇(75.8%)随机对照试验、66篇(8.1%)非随机对照临床研究、84篇(10.4%)病例系列和3篇(0.4%)病例报告。排名前十的疾病/状况包括糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、高血压、腰痛、颈痛、中风、冠心病、认知障碍、失眠以及骨质疏松症或骨质减少症。2003年中国国家体育总局的版本是最常用的八段锦版本,练习八段锦的平均时长为35分钟,每天1或2次,每周3至5天,平均持续时间为18周。还值得注意的是,没有与八段锦干预相关的严重不良事件。大多数研究为小样本量研究,随机对照试验的方法学质量普遍较低。八段锦的临床研究数量可观且有证据基础。然而,不同研究在诸如样式、强度、持续时间、学习和练习方法等具体干预措施方面存在显著差异,需要进一步规范和统一。建议开展进一步高质量设计和报告的研究,以进一步验证八段锦的临床益处。