Reiter Amanda S, DiCostanzo Alfredo, Webb Megan, Zeltwanger Josh, Sheaffer Craig C, Jaqueth Aubrey, Martinson Krishona L
Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.
Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Sep 9;4(3):txaa167. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa167. eCollection 2020 Jul.
Storing hay outdoors can result in detrimental changes in forage quality. Additionally, alfalfa ( L.) cultivar may influence dry matter intake (DMI) and hay waste when feeding livestock. The objectives were to determine the effects of conventional or reduced-lignin alfalfa round bales stored outdoors and wrapped with plastic twine, net wrap, or B-Wrap on forage quality, beef cow preference, and hay waste. Round bales made from reduced-lignin ( = 12) or conventional ( = 12) alfalfa cultivars were baled and stored outdoors for 16 mo. Within each cultivar, four bale replicates were bound with plastic twine, net wrap, or B-Wrap. After storage, bales were fed in a switchback design with period confounded with alfalfa cultivar to 18 lactating Angus cows ( L.). The pairs had ad libitum access to three round-bale feeders where bales of each wrap type were placed for eight 48 h periods. Position of round bale wrap type was rotated according to a Latin Square arrangement. Bales were weighed and waste surrounding each feeder was collected at 24 and 48 h to calculate DMI and hay waste. Statistical significance was set at < 0.05. Alfalfa cultivar did not impact any of the response variables ( > 0.05). At feeding, round bales wrapped in net wrap had greater ( < 0.015) moisture content (16.4%) compared with those wrapped with B-Wrap (12.8%). Neutral detergent fiber was lower ( = 0.03) in bales wrapped in B-Wrap (46%) compared with twine-tied bales (49%) while net wrapped bales were not different. Total digestible nutrients ( = 0.02), and relative feed value ( = 0.04) were lower in twine-tied bales compared with B-Wrap while net wrapped bales were not different. Twine (7.1 × 10 colony forming units [CFU]/g) and net wrap (4.7 × 10 CFU/g) bales had greater ( < 0.0001) mold counts than B-Wrap bales (4.8 × 10 CFU/g), while concentrations of other forage components and yeast counts were not different among wrap types ( > 0.05). Total DMI, and DMI during the first 24 h, were greater ( ≤ 0.032) for B-Wrap bales compared to twine-tied bales indicating preference for hay wrapped in B-Wrap; net wrapped bales were not different. Dry matter intake in the first 24 h was negatively associated with the mold count ( = -0.52; = 0.02), and hay waste was not affected by wrap type ( > 0.05). These results confirm that wrap type affected forage quality and mold counts, which in turn influenced beef cattle preference of round bales stored outdoors.
将干草存放在户外会导致饲料质量发生有害变化。此外,紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)品种可能会影响给家畜喂食时的干物质摄入量(DMI)和干草浪费情况。本研究的目的是确定用塑料绳、网包或B型包裹材料包裹并存放在户外的常规或低木质素紫花苜蓿圆捆对饲料质量、肉牛偏好和干草浪费的影响。用低木质素(n = 12)或常规(n = 12)紫花苜蓿品种制成的圆捆打捆后在户外存放16个月。在每个品种内,四个捆重复样本分别用塑料绳、网包或B型包裹材料捆扎。储存后,以折返设计给18头泌乳期安格斯母牛(Bos taurus L.)投喂圆捆,试验期与紫花苜蓿品种混淆。每对母牛可以自由使用三个圆捆喂食器,每种包裹类型的圆捆在其中放置八个48小时周期。圆捆包裹类型的位置根据拉丁方排列进行轮换。在24小时和48小时时对圆捆称重,并收集每个喂食器周围的废弃物,以计算DMI和干草浪费量。设定统计学显著性水平为P < 0.05。紫花苜蓿品种对任何响应变量均无影响(P > 0.05)。在喂食时,与用B型包裹材料包裹的圆捆(12.8%)相比,用网包包裹的圆捆水分含量更高(P < 0.015)(16.4%)。与用绳子捆扎的圆捆(49%)相比,用B型包裹材料包裹的圆捆中性洗涤纤维含量更低(P = 0.03)(46%),而用网包包裹的圆捆则无差异。与用B型包裹材料包裹的圆捆相比,用绳子捆扎的圆捆总可消化养分(P = 0.02)和相对饲用价值(P = 0.04)更低,而用网包包裹的圆捆则无差异。用绳子(7.1×10⁵菌落形成单位[CFU]/克)和网包(4.7×10⁵CFU/克)包裹的圆捆霉菌计数高于用B型包裹材料包裹的圆捆(4.8×10⁴CFU/克)(P < 0.0001),而其他饲料成分浓度和酵母菌计数在不同包裹类型之间无差异(P > 0.05)。与用绳子捆扎的圆捆相比,用B型包裹材料包裹的圆捆总DMI以及前24小时的DMI更高(P ≤ 0.032),表明肉牛更喜欢用B型包裹材料包裹的干草;用网包包裹的圆捆则无差异。前24小时的干物质摄入量与霉菌计数呈负相关(r = -0.52;P = 0.02),干草浪费不受包裹类型影响(P > 0.05)。这些结果证实,包裹类型影响饲料质量和霉菌计数,进而影响存放在户外的圆捆肉牛偏好。