Marsh S S
University of Texas Health Science Center Library, Dallas 75235.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Jul;75(3):248-52.
Citations selected from the bibliographies of recent texts, a specialized subject bibliography, and review articles were checked in both Cumulated Index Medicus (IM) and the Bibliography of Bioethics (BB) to compare coverage, publication delay, probable causes of indexing and retrieval failure, and the ease with which relevant citations were retrieved. The study also attempted to determine whether BB included appropriate articles from the MEDLINE database in a timely and systematic manner. While 98% of the IM citations appeared within a year of publication, 79% of the BB citations appeared two to three years after their publication dates. The average citation appeared twice as frequently in IM as in BB.
从近期教科书的参考文献、专业主题书目和综述文章中选出的引文,在《医学累积索引》(IM)和《生物伦理学书目》(BB)中进行了核对,以比较覆盖范围、出版延迟、索引和检索失败的可能原因,以及检索相关引文的难易程度。该研究还试图确定BB是否及时、系统地收录了MEDLINE数据库中的合适文章。虽然98%的IM引文在出版后一年内出现,但79%的BB引文在其出版日期后的两到三年出现。平均而言,IM中的引文出现频率是BB中的两倍。