IQVIA, 1 IMS Drive, Plymouth Meeting, PA, 19462, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Mar;39(3):317-330. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00967-7. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Oral semaglutide was approved in 2019 for blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and was the first oral glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). T2DM is associated with substantial healthcare expenditures in the US, so the cost of a new intervention should be weighed against clinical benefits.
This study evaluated the budget impact of a treatment pathway with oral semaglutide 14 mg daily versus oral sitagliptin 100 mg daily among patients not achieving target glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level despite treatment with metformin.
This study used the validated IQVIA™ CORE Diabetes Model to simulate the treatment impact of oral semaglutide 14 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg over a 5-year time horizon from a US healthcare sector (payer) perspective. Trial data (PIONEER 3) informed cohort characteristics and treatment effects, and literature sources informed event costs. Population and market share data were from the literature and data on file. The analysis evaluated the estimated budget impact of oral semaglutide 14 mg use for patients currently using sitagliptin 100 mg considering both direct medical and treatment costs to understand the impact on total cost of care, given underlying treatment performance and impact on avoidable events.
In a hypothetical plan of 1 million lives, an estimated 1993 patients were treated with sitagliptin 100 mg in the target population. Following these patients over 5 years, the incremental direct medical and treatment costs of a patient using oral semaglutide 14 mg versus sitagliptin 100 mg was $US16,562, a 70.7% increase (year 2019 values). A hypothetical payer would spend an additional $US3,300,143 (7.1%) over 5 years for every 10% of market share that oral semaglutide 14 mg takes away from sitagliptin 100 mg. Univariate and scenario analyses with alternate inputs and assumptions demonstrated consistent results.
Use of oral semaglutide 14 mg in patients currently receiving sitagliptin 100 mg substantially increases the budget impact for patients with T2DM whose blood glucose level is not controlled with metformin over a 5-year time horizon for US healthcare payers.
口服司美格鲁肽于 2019 年获批用于控制 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖,是首个口服胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)。在美国,T2DM 会产生大量医疗保健支出,因此新干预措施的成本应与临床获益相权衡。
本研究评估了在接受二甲双胍治疗但糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平仍未达标的患者中,每日使用口服司美格鲁肽 14mg 与每日使用口服西格列汀 100mg 的治疗路径的预算影响。
本研究采用经过验证的 IQVIA™ CORE Diabetes Model,从美国医疗保健部门(支付方)的角度,模拟了口服司美格鲁肽 14mg 和西格列汀 100mg 治疗 5 年的效果。试验数据(PIONEER 3)为队列特征和治疗效果提供了信息,文献来源则提供了事件成本信息。人群和市场份额数据来自文献和存档数据。该分析评估了考虑到潜在治疗效果和避免事件的影响,目前使用西格列汀 100mg 的患者使用口服司美格鲁肽 14mg 的估计预算影响,以了解对总护理成本的影响。
在一个有 100 万例患者的假设计划中,目标人群中估计有 1993 例患者接受西格列汀 100mg 治疗。在接下来的 5 年中,与使用西格列汀 100mg 的患者相比,使用口服司美格鲁肽 14mg 的患者的直接医疗和治疗成本增量为 16562 美元,增加了 70.7%(2019 年值)。假设支付方在 5 年内每增加 10%的口服司美格鲁肽 14mg 市场份额,就会额外支出 3300143 美元(7.1%)。使用替代输入和假设的单变量和情景分析得出了一致的结果。
在接受西格列汀 100mg 治疗的患者中使用口服司美格鲁肽 14mg,在 5 年内显著增加了接受二甲双胍治疗但血糖控制不佳的 T2DM 患者的预算影响,这对美国医疗保健支付方而言。