Rheumatology Unit, Department of Musculoskeletal System, Local Health Trust 3, Via Missolungi 14, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
Orthogeriatric Unit, Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Sep;33(9):2529-2537. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01777-9. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
A novel effervescent buffered solution of 70 mg alendronate (ALN-EX) was developed to improve upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability over alendronate tablets (ALN-T). Whether a better GI tolerability can improve persistence remains to be determined.
This study evaluated persistence and reasons for discontinuation in patients treated with ALN-EX compared to a historical cohort on ALN-T.
Post-menopausal women (PMW) from a standardized clinical database with BMD T-score < -2.5, or between -2 and -2.5 and at least one vertebral fracture, starting ALN-EX between July 2015 and June 2016 were included. A historical cohort comprised of randomly selected and age-matched PMW on ALN-T was used as a control. Persistence at 6 and 12 months and reasons for discontinuation (e.g. adverse events; AE) were compared between the two groups.
A total of 144 PMW on ALN-EX and 216 PMW on ALN-T were analysed. Persistence at 6 and 12 months was 91% and 81% in the ALN-EX group vs. 75% and 69% in the ALN-T group, this difference attaining statistical significance at both 6- (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.009). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving ALN-T discontinued treatment due to GI AEs (4% ALN-EX vs. 11% ALN-T; p = 0.027), or patient's decision to discontinue (6% ALN-EX vs. 13% ALN-T; p = 0.016). The adjusted odds ratio of persisting on ALN-EX treatment at 12 months was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.21-3.41, p = 0.008).
Our findings demonstrate that ALN-EX can provide greater persistence and improved tolerability compared to ALN-T, allowing it to be a viable alternative option in the management of osteoporosis.
为了提高上消化道(GI)耐受性,开发了一种新型的 70mg 阿伦膦酸钠(ALN-EX)泡腾缓冲溶液,优于阿伦膦酸钠片(ALN-T)。更好的 GI 耐受性是否能提高持续性仍有待确定。
本研究评估了与历史队列中的 ALN-T 相比,接受 ALN-EX 治疗的患者的持续性和停药原因。
从标准化临床数据库中纳入了绝经后妇女(PMW),其骨密度 T 评分 < -2.5,或在-2 至-2.5 之间且至少有一处椎体骨折,于 2015 年 7 月至 2016 年 6 月期间开始接受 ALN-EX 治疗。一个历史队列由随机选择的、年龄匹配的接受 ALN-T 的 PMW 组成,作为对照组。比较两组患者在 6 个月和 12 个月时的持续性和停药原因(如不良事件;AE)。
共纳入了 144 名接受 ALN-EX 治疗的 PMW 和 216 名接受 ALN-T 治疗的 PMW。ALN-EX 组的 6 个月和 12 个月的持续性分别为 91%和 81%,而 ALN-T 组的分别为 75%和 69%,两组在 6 个月(p < 0.001)和 12 个月(p = 0.009)时差异均有统计学意义。接受 ALN-T 治疗的患者因 GI AE(4% ALN-EX 组比 11% ALN-T 组;p = 0.027)或患者决定停药(6% ALN-EX 组比 13% ALN-T 组;p = 0.016)而停药的比例显著更高。12 个月时继续接受 ALN-EX 治疗的调整后的优势比为 2.02(95%CI:1.21-3.41,p = 0.008)。
我们的研究结果表明,与 ALN-T 相比,ALN-EX 可以提供更高的持续性和更好的耐受性,使其成为骨质疏松症治疗的一种可行替代方案。