• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪调节策略使用的变异性与抑郁症状呈负相关。

Variability in emotion regulation strategy use is negatively associated with depressive symptoms.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2021 Mar;35(2):324-340. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1840337. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2020.1840337
PMID:33150844
Abstract

Variability in the emotion regulation (ER) strategies one uses throughout daily life has been suggested to reflect adaptive ER ability and to act as a protective factor in mental health. Moreover, psychological inflexibility and persistent negative affect (or ) are key features of depression and other forms of mental illness and are often further exacerbated by rigid or overly passive regulatory behaviours. The current study investigated the hypothesis that ER variability might serve as a protective factor against depressive symptoms and affective inertia. Using experience-sampling ( = 213), we tested whether two indictors of ER variability (between- and within-strategy SDs) were related to depressive symptoms and affective inertia. We found that people with higher between-strategy variability and within-strategy variability (specifically for reappraisal and distraction) reported fewer depressive symptoms. Both within- and between-strategy variability were negatively related to negative affective inertia. Between-strategy variability and negative affective inertia had unique effects on depression, when used as simultaneous predictors. Altogether, this study provides further evidence for the utility of ER as a factor buffering against depressive symptoms and particularly for the use of variable ER strategies.

摘要

日常生活中情绪调节(ER)策略的变化被认为反映了适应性 ER 能力,并作为心理健康的保护因素。此外,心理不灵活性和持续的负面情绪(或)是抑郁症和其他形式的精神疾病的关键特征,并且通常会因僵化或过度被动的调节行为而进一步加剧。本研究假设 ER 变异性可以作为预防抑郁症状和情感惯性的保护因素。使用经验抽样( = 213),我们测试了 ER 变异性的两个指标(策略间和策略内标准差)是否与抑郁症状和情感惯性有关。我们发现,策略间变异性和策略内变异性(特别是再评价和分心)较高的人报告的抑郁症状较少。内策略和外策略变异性均与负性情感惯性呈负相关。当同时作为预测因子使用时,策略间变异性和负性情感惯性对抑郁有独特的影响。总之,这项研究为 ER 作为预防抑郁症状的因素提供了进一步的证据,尤其是对于使用可变的 ER 策略。

相似文献

1
Variability in emotion regulation strategy use is negatively associated with depressive symptoms.情绪调节策略使用的变异性与抑郁症状呈负相关。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Mar;35(2):324-340. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1840337. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Higher emotion regulation flexibility predicts more stable negative emotions and faster affective recovery in early psychosis: an experience sampling study.更高的情绪调节灵活性可预测早期精神病患者更稳定的负性情绪和更快的情绪恢复:一项经验抽样研究。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(9):2063-2072. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000151. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
3
Combining experience sampling with temporal network analysis to understand inertia of negative emotion in dysphoria.结合经验采样和时变网络分析来理解抑郁中负性情绪的惯性。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 1;338:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study.情绪调节模式:在经验采样研究中捕捉情绪调节的可变性和灵活性。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Aug;63(4):297-307. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12808. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Ruminative Inertia, Emotion Regulation, and Depression: A Daily-Diary Study.沉思惰性、情绪调节与抑郁:一项日记研究。
Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1477-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use, variability, and flexibility: An experience sampling approach.年龄对情绪调节策略使用、变异性和灵活性的影响:一项经验抽样研究。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;55(9):1951-1964. doi: 10.1037/dev0000727.
7
Emotion dynamics in current and remitted depression: an ecological momentary assessment study.抑郁发作期和缓解期的情绪动态:一项基于实时评估的研究。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(9):2222-2229. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000369. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Emotion regulation dynamics in daily life: Adaptive strategy use may be variable without being unstable and predictable without being autoregressive.日常生活中的情绪调节动态:适应性策略的使用可能是可变的,而不是不稳定的;是可预测的,而不是自回归的。
Emotion. 2022 Oct;22(7):1487-1504. doi: 10.1037/emo0000967. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Relationships between trait emotion dysregulation and emotional experiences in daily life: an experience sampling study.特质情绪失调与日常生活中情绪体验的关系:一项经验抽样研究。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):743-755. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1681364. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
Emotion Beliefs, Emotion Regulation, and Emotional Experiences in Daily Life.情绪信念、情绪调节与日常生活中的情绪体验
Behav Ther. 2020 Sep;51(5):728-738. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Resilience in advanced cancer patients who obtain a long-term response to immunotherapy or targeted therapy: an Ecological Momentary Assessment study.对免疫疗法或靶向疗法获得长期反应的晚期癌症患者的复原力:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf042.
2
The role of affective control, strategy repertoire and subjective emotion regulation success in developmental internalising psychopathology.情感控制、策略组合和主观情绪调节成功在发展性内化精神病理学中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 11;14(1):21224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72336-9.
3
Momentary impulsivity interferes with emotion regulation strategy prioritization in everyday life in remitted depression.
在缓解期抑郁症的日常生活中,瞬间冲动会干扰情绪调节策略的优先级。
Behav Res Ther. 2024 Jan;172:104424. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104424. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
4
Relationships among nursing students' self-concept clarity, meaning in life, emotion regulation ability and depression: Testing a moderated mediation model.护生自我概念清晰度、生活意义、情绪调节能力与抑郁之间的关系:检验一个有调节的中介模型
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 29;13:1003587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003587. eCollection 2022.
5
Interoceptive attention facilitates emotion regulation strategy use.内感受性注意有助于情绪调节策略的运用。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jan-Apr;23(1):100336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100336. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
6
Cognitive fusion and personality traits in the context of mindfulness: A cross-sectional study.正念背景下的认知融合与人格特质:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0273331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273331. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploring the digital footprint of depression: a PRISMA systematic literature review of the empirical evidence.探索抑郁症的数字足迹:一项关于实证证据的 PRISMA 系统文献综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04013-y.