Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Aug;63(4):297-307. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12808. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10-day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotions and their ER efforts in response to those emotions. We evaluated the association between ER (i.e., between and within ER strategy variability and ER flexibility, operationalized as putatively adaptive, putatively maladaptive and total strategies) and measures of well-being (psychological distress, satisfaction with life) in general (person-level) and in everyday life (day-level). Higher within-variability indicated that a strategy was used more at some occasions and less at others. Higher between-variability indicated variation in the extent to which different strategies were engaged at the same time point. Overall, results were mixed, but in some instances, indicators of ER variability and ER flexibility were related to each other and measures of well-being differently. Total within ER variability was negatively associated with well-being at the person and day level. Putatively adaptive between and within ER variability were associated with less well-being at the person level. At the day level, putatively adaptive and maladaptive between ER variability and maladaptive within ER variability were negatively associated with well-being. Putatively adaptive ER flexibility was negatively associated with satisfaction with life. This study adds to the literature on indicators of variability and flexibility in ER and their potential adaptiveness. The results indicate that variability in ER could be a maladaptive property, but more research is needed to understand this in terms of putatively adaptive and maladaptive strategies. Future studies on the adaptiveness of these indicators should obtain more contextual information.
情绪调节(ER)的变异性和灵活性被认为是适应性 ER 的重要组成部分。目前,人们很少尝试对 ER 的变异性和灵活性进行操作化。在两项为期 10 天的体验抽样研究(N=51 和 39)中,健康参与者评估了他们的即时情绪以及他们对这些情绪的 ER 努力。我们评估了 ER(即,在 ER 策略变异性和 ER 灵活性之间以及在 ER 灵活性内部,操作化为适应性、非适应性和总策略)与幸福感(一般心理困扰、生活满意度)之间的关联在个人层面和日常生活层面。更高的内部变异性表明,一种策略在某些情况下使用较多,而在其他情况下使用较少。更高的跨变异性表明,在同一时间点不同策略的使用程度存在差异。总体而言,结果喜忧参半,但在某些情况下,ER 变异性和 ER 灵活性的指标与彼此以及幸福感的测量结果不同。总 ER 内部变异性与个人和日常水平的幸福感呈负相关。适应性跨和内部 ER 变异性与个人水平的幸福感较低有关。在日常水平上,适应性和非适应性 ER 之间的跨变异性和非适应性 ER 内部变异性与幸福感呈负相关。适应性 ER 灵活性与生活满意度呈负相关。这项研究增加了 ER 变异性和灵活性指标及其潜在适应性的文献。研究结果表明,ER 的变异性可能是一种适应性较差的特性,但需要更多的研究来理解适应性和非适应性策略方面的变异性。未来关于这些指标适应性的研究应获得更多的背景信息。