• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在干旱条件下,番茄气孔关闭是由土壤-根系水力阻力的增加驱动的。

Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance.

机构信息

Chair of Soil Physics, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Khartoum North, Sudan.

出版信息

Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Feb;44(2):425-431. doi: 10.1111/pce.13939. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1111/pce.13939
PMID:33150971
Abstract

The fundamental question as to what triggers stomatal closure during soil drying remains contentious. Thus, we urgently need to improve our understanding of stomatal response to water deficits in soil and atmosphere. Here, we investigated the role of soil-plant hydraulic conductance (K ) on transpiration (E) and stomatal regulation. We used a root pressure chamber to measure the relation between E, leaf xylem water potential (ψ ) and soil water potential (ψ ) in tomato. Additional measurements of ψ were performed with unpressurized plants. A soil-plant hydraulic model was used to simulate E(ψ ) for decreasing ψ . In wet soils, E(ψ ) had a constant slope, while in dry soils, the slope decreased, with ψ rapidly and nonlinearly decreasing for moderate increases in E. The ψ measured in pressurized and unpressurized plants matched well, which indicates that the shoot hydraulic conductance did not decrease during soil drying and that the decrease in K is caused by a decrease in soil-root conductance. The decrease of E matched well the onset of hydraulic nonlinearity. Our findings demonstrate that stomatal closure prevents the drop in ψ caused by a decrease in K and elucidate a strong correlation between stomatal regulation and belowground hydraulic limitation.

摘要

在土壤干燥过程中引发气孔关闭的根本问题仍然存在争议。因此,我们迫切需要提高对土壤和大气中水分亏缺条件下气孔响应的理解。在这里,我们研究了土壤-植物水力传导度(K)对蒸腾作用(E)和气孔调节的作用。我们使用根压室来测量番茄中 E、叶片木质部水势(ψ)和土壤水势(ψ)之间的关系。使用未加压植物进行了额外的 ψ测量。使用土壤-植物水力模型模拟了ψ下降时的 E(ψ)。在湿润的土壤中,E(ψ)具有恒定的斜率,而在干燥的土壤中,斜率减小,随着 E 的适度增加,ψ迅速且非线性地减小。加压和未加压植物中测量的 ψ 值匹配良好,这表明在土壤干燥过程中,茎部水力传导度没有下降,而 K 的下降是由土壤-根传导度的下降引起的。E 的下降与水力非线性的开始很好地匹配。我们的发现表明,气孔关闭防止了由于 K 的下降而导致的 ψ下降,并阐明了气孔调节和地下水力限制之间的强烈相关性。

相似文献

1
Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance.在干旱条件下,番茄气孔关闭是由土壤-根系水力阻力的增加驱动的。
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Feb;44(2):425-431. doi: 10.1111/pce.13939. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Stomatal closure during water deficit is controlled by below-ground hydraulics.在水分亏缺时,气孔关闭由地下水力控制。
Ann Bot. 2022 Jan 28;129(2):161-170. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab141.
3
Coupled effects of soil drying and salinity on soil-plant hydraulics.土壤干燥和盐度对土壤-植物水力学的耦合影响。
Plant Physiol. 2022 Sep 28;190(2):1228-1241. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac229.
4
Dynamic soil hydraulic resistance regulates stomata.动态土壤水力阻力调节气孔。
New Phytol. 2024 Oct;244(1):147-158. doi: 10.1111/nph.20020. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Stomatal closure of Pelargonium × hortorum in response to soil water deficit is associated with decreased leaf water potential only under rapid soil drying.天竺葵气孔关闭对土壤水分亏缺的响应仅在土壤快速干燥时与叶片水势降低有关。
Physiol Plant. 2016 Jan;156(1):84-96. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12346. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
6
Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut.解析核桃水分胁迫期间植物水力对气孔关闭的影响
Plant Physiol. 2002 Jan;128(1):282-90.
7
Transpiration Reduction in Maize ( L) in Response to Soil Drying.玉米(L)对土壤干燥的蒸腾作用降低
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 23;10:1695. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01695. eCollection 2019.
8
Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress.在中度水分胁迫下,根系水分运输能力下降导致橄榄树气孔关闭。
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(1):126-134. doi: 10.1111/nph.16177. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
9
Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress.水分胁迫下 Pinus radiata 根系水通道蛋白调节控制植物水力传导率、气孔导度和叶片水势。
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Feb;42(2):717-729. doi: 10.1111/pce.13460. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Pragmatic hydraulic theory predicts stomatal responses to climatic water deficits.实用水力理论预测气孔对气候性水分亏缺的响应。
New Phytol. 2016 Nov;212(3):577-589. doi: 10.1111/nph.14059. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Field plants strategically regulate water uptake from different soil depths by spatiotemporally adjusting their radial root hydraulic conductivity.田间植物通过时空调节其径向根系水力传导率,从不同土壤深度战略性地调节水分吸收。
New Phytol. 2025 Jul;247(2):546-561. doi: 10.1111/nph.70013. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Contrasting the soil-plant hydraulics of beech and spruce by linking root water uptake to transpiration dynamics.通过将根系水分吸收与蒸腾动态联系起来,对比山毛榉和云杉的土壤-植物水力学。
Tree Physiol. 2025 Jan 25;45(1). doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpae158.
3
Integrated Effects of Soil Moisture on Wheat Hydraulic Properties and Stomatal Regulation.
土壤水分对小麦水力特性和气孔调节的综合影响
Plants (Basel). 2024 Aug 14;13(16):2263. doi: 10.3390/plants13162263.
4
Influence of Time-Lag Effects between Winter-Wheat Canopy Temperature and Atmospheric Temperature on the Accuracy of CWSI Inversion of Photosynthetic Parameters.冬小麦冠层温度与大气温度的时间滞后效应对光合参数CWSI反演精度的影响
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;13(12):1702. doi: 10.3390/plants13121702.
5
Predawn leaf water potential of grapevines is not necessarily a good proxy for soil moisture.葡萄树拂晓前的叶片水势不一定能很好地反映土壤水分状况。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04378-6.
6
Transpiration response to soil drying versus increasing vapor pressure deficit in crops: physical and physiological mechanisms and key plant traits.作物蒸腾对土壤干燥和水汽压亏缺增加的响应:物理和生理机制以及关键植物性状。
J Exp Bot. 2023 Sep 2;74(16):4789-4807. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad221.
7
Constant hydraulic supply and ABA dynamics facilitate the trade-offs in water and carbon.恒定的水力供应和脱落酸动态变化促进了水分与碳之间的权衡。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 17;14:1140938. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1140938. eCollection 2023.
8
Above and belowground traits impacting transpiration decline during soil drying in 48 maize (Zea mays) genotypes.在 48 个玉米(Zea mays)基因型中,影响土壤干燥过程中蒸腾作用下降的地上和地下特征。
Ann Bot. 2023 Mar 8;131(2):373-386. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac147.
9
Stomatal conductance tracks soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in faba bean and maize during soil drying.在土壤干燥过程中,豌豆和玉米的气孔导度跟踪土壤到叶片的水力导度。
Plant Physiol. 2022 Nov 28;190(4):2279-2294. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac422.
10
Burning questions for a warming and changing world: 15 unknowns in plant abiotic stress.热议话题:全球变暖与变化背景下的 15 个植物非生物胁迫未知因素
Plant Cell. 2023 Jan 2;35(1):67-108. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac263.