• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对卷入法律系统女孩的家庭干预:一项混合方法评估。

Family-based Intervention for Legal System-involved Girls: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.

作者信息

Anderson Valerie R, Rubino Laura L, McKenna Nicole C

机构信息

School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;67(1-2):35-49. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12475. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1002/ajcp.12475
PMID:33150983
Abstract

The increased proportion of juvenile court-involved girls has spurred interest to implement and evaluate services to reduce girls' system involvement. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a family-based intervention by using a dominant sequential mixed methods evaluation approach. First, we examined quantitative data using a quasi-experimental design to determine whether the family-based intervention reduced recidivism among court-involved girls. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to construct statistically equivalent groups to compare one-year recidivism outcomes for girls who received the court-run family-based intervention (n = 181) to a group of girls on probation who did not receive the intervention (n = 803). Qualitative interviews (n = 39) were conducted to contextualize the quantitative findings and highlighted the circumstances that family-focused interventions for court-involved girls. Girls who received the program had slightly lower recidivism rates following the intervention. The qualitative findings contextualized the quasi-experimental results by providing an explanation as to the girls' family circumstances and insights into the mechanisms of the intervention. Results highlighted the importance of family-focused interventions for juvenile justice-involved girls. These findings have practical and policy implications for the use interventions-beyond the individual level-with adjudicated girls and offer suggestions for ways to improve their effectiveness using a community psychology lens. In addition, this paper includes a discussion of evaluating of juvenile court programming from a community psychology perspective including strengths, challenges, and considerations for future work in this area.

摘要

涉及少年法庭的女孩比例增加,引发了人们对实施和评估减少女孩卷入该系统的服务的兴趣。本研究的目的是通过使用一种占主导地位的顺序混合方法评估方法,来检验基于家庭的干预措施的有效性。首先,我们使用准实验设计来检验定量数据,以确定基于家庭的干预措施是否能减少涉及法庭的女孩的再犯率。倾向得分匹配法(PSM)用于构建统计学上等效的组,以比较接受法庭运行的基于家庭的干预措施的女孩(n = 181)与未接受干预措施的缓刑女孩组(n = 803)的一年再犯结果。进行了定性访谈(n = 39),以便将定量研究结果置于具体情境中,并突出针对涉及法庭的女孩的以家庭为重点的干预措施的情况。接受该项目的女孩在干预后再犯率略低。定性研究结果通过解释女孩的家庭情况以及对干预机制的洞察,将准实验结果置于具体情境中。结果突出了以家庭为重点的干预措施对涉及少年司法的女孩的重要性。这些发现对使用超越个体层面的干预措施来处理被判定有罪的女孩具有实际和政策意义,并从社区心理学的角度为提高其有效性的方法提供了建议。此外,本文还从社区心理学的角度讨论了对少年法庭项目的评估,包括该领域未来工作的优势、挑战和注意事项。

相似文献

1
Family-based Intervention for Legal System-involved Girls: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.针对卷入法律系统女孩的家庭干预:一项混合方法评估。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;67(1-2):35-49. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12475. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood.少年法庭经历对青年期犯罪的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;54(3):291-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02616.x. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
3
Contextualizing the nature of trauma in the juvenile justice trajectories of girls.将创伤的本质置于少女少年司法轨迹的背景中。
J Prev Interv Community. 2019 Apr-Jun;47(2):138-153. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1582141. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
Polyvictimization and Girls' Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: Investigating Gender-Differentiated Patterns of Risk, Recidivism, and Resilience.多受害与少女涉入少年司法制度:探究风险、累犯与复原力的性别差异模式。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Mar;33(5):789-809. doi: 10.1177/0886260517744843.
5
"This is probably the reason why she resorted to that kind of action": A qualitative analysis of juvenile justice workers attributions for girls' offending.“这或许就是她采取那种行为的原因”:对青少年司法工作者对女孩犯罪归因的定性分析
J Prev Interv Community. 2019 Apr-Jun;47(2):154-170. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1582142. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
6
Exploring the Impact of an AVRS Curfew Program on Recidivism of Juvenile Probationers in Korea.探索韩国自动语音应答系统宵禁计划对青少年缓刑犯再犯罪的影响。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(14):4425-4444. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18790427. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Justice involvement and girls' sexual health: Directions for policy and practice.司法介入与女孩的性健康:政策与实践指南
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019 Mar;98:278-283. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
8
The Integration of Family and Group Therapy as an Alternative to Juvenile Incarceration: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation Using Parenting with Love and Limits.家庭与团体治疗相结合作为青少年监禁替代方案:一项使用“爱与界限育儿法”的准实验评估
Fam Process. 2017 Jun;56(2):331-347. doi: 10.1111/famp.12187. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Making history for justice reform: Can the country end girls' incarceration?创造司法改革的历史:这个国家能终结少女监禁现象吗?
J Prev Interv Community. 2019 Apr-Jun;47(2):125-137. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1582144.
10
The Nature of Co-Occurring Exposure to Violence and of Court Responses to Girls in the Juvenile Justice System.青少年司法系统中女孩遭受暴力的同时发生情况及法庭应对措施的性质。
Violence Against Women. 2016 Jul;22(8):923-42. doi: 10.1177/1077801215614973. Epub 2015 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing caregivers of youth at risk for substance use and caregiver engagement in the youth legal system: a mixed methods approach.描述有物质使用风险的青少年的照顾者以及照顾者在青少年法律系统中的参与情况:一种混合方法研究。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Apr 8;5:1455111. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1455111. eCollection 2025.
2
Mixed methods in community psychology: A values-forward synthesis.社区心理学中的混合方法:一种价值先行的综合。
Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Dec;72(3-4):355-365. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12703. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Are risk-need-responsivity principles golden? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community correction programs.
风险-需求-反应性原则是万能的吗?对社区矫正项目随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Exp Criminol. 2023 Jan 7:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11292-022-09550-w.