Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):3897-3908. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00294. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Purpose Assessment of strained voice quality is difficult due to the weak reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation and lack of strong acoustic correlates. This study evaluated the contributions of relative fundamental frequency (RFF) and mid-to-high frequency noise to the perception of strain. Method Stimuli were created using recordings of speakers producing /ifi/ with a comfortable voice and with maximum vocal effort. RFF values of the comfortable voice samples were synthetically lowered, and RFF values of the maximum vocal effort samples were synthetically raised. Mid-to-high frequency noise was added to the samples. Twenty listeners rated strain in a visual sort-and-rate task. The effects of RFF modification and added noise on strain were assessed using an analysis of variance; intra- and interrater reliability were compared with and without noise. Results Lowering RFF in the comfortable voice samples increased their perceived strain, whereas raising RFF in the maximum vocal effort samples decreased their strain. Adding noise increased strain and decreased intra- and interrater reliability relative to samples without added noise. Conclusions Both RFF and mid-to-high frequency noise contribute to the perception of strain. The presence of dysphonia may decrease the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of strain, which supports the need for complementary objective assessments. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13172252.
目的
由于听觉感知评估的可靠性较弱,且缺乏强有力的声学相关性,因此评估声音紧张度较为困难。本研究评估了相对基频(RFF)和中高频噪声对紧张度感知的贡献。
方法
使用以舒适声和最大声努力发音的说话者的录音来创建刺激。舒适声样本的 RFF 值被人为降低,最大声努力样本的 RFF 值被人为升高。然后向样本中添加中高频噪声。20 名听众在视觉排序和评分任务中对紧张度进行评分。使用方差分析评估 RFF 修饰和添加噪声对紧张度的影响;比较有无噪声时的内部和外部评分者可靠性。
结果
降低舒适声样本中的 RFF 会增加其感知到的紧张度,而升高最大声努力样本中的 RFF 会降低其紧张度。与无噪声样本相比,添加噪声会增加紧张度,并降低内部和外部评分者可靠性。
结论
RFF 和中高频噪声都会影响紧张度的感知。发声障碍的存在可能会降低听觉感知评估紧张度的可靠性,这支持了对补充客观评估的需求。