Suppr超能文献

使用合成修改后的语音样本进行应变的感知和声学评估。

Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.

Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):3897-3908. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00294. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

Abstract

Purpose Assessment of strained voice quality is difficult due to the weak reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation and lack of strong acoustic correlates. This study evaluated the contributions of relative fundamental frequency (RFF) and mid-to-high frequency noise to the perception of strain. Method Stimuli were created using recordings of speakers producing /ifi/ with a comfortable voice and with maximum vocal effort. RFF values of the comfortable voice samples were synthetically lowered, and RFF values of the maximum vocal effort samples were synthetically raised. Mid-to-high frequency noise was added to the samples. Twenty listeners rated strain in a visual sort-and-rate task. The effects of RFF modification and added noise on strain were assessed using an analysis of variance; intra- and interrater reliability were compared with and without noise. Results Lowering RFF in the comfortable voice samples increased their perceived strain, whereas raising RFF in the maximum vocal effort samples decreased their strain. Adding noise increased strain and decreased intra- and interrater reliability relative to samples without added noise. Conclusions Both RFF and mid-to-high frequency noise contribute to the perception of strain. The presence of dysphonia may decrease the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of strain, which supports the need for complementary objective assessments. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13172252.

摘要

目的

由于听觉感知评估的可靠性较弱,且缺乏强有力的声学相关性,因此评估声音紧张度较为困难。本研究评估了相对基频(RFF)和中高频噪声对紧张度感知的贡献。

方法

使用以舒适声和最大声努力发音的说话者的录音来创建刺激。舒适声样本的 RFF 值被人为降低,最大声努力样本的 RFF 值被人为升高。然后向样本中添加中高频噪声。20 名听众在视觉排序和评分任务中对紧张度进行评分。使用方差分析评估 RFF 修饰和添加噪声对紧张度的影响;比较有无噪声时的内部和外部评分者可靠性。

结果

降低舒适声样本中的 RFF 会增加其感知到的紧张度,而升高最大声努力样本中的 RFF 会降低其紧张度。与无噪声样本相比,添加噪声会增加紧张度,并降低内部和外部评分者可靠性。

结论

RFF 和中高频噪声都会影响紧张度的感知。发声障碍的存在可能会降低听觉感知评估紧张度的可靠性,这支持了对补充客观评估的需求。

相似文献

1
Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):3897-3908. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00294. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Effects of Adventitious Acute Vocal Trauma: Relative Fundamental Frequency and Listener Perception.
J Voice. 2016 Mar;30(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 28.
3
Acoustic correlate of vocal effort in spasmodic dysphonia.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Mar;122(3):169-76. doi: 10.1177/000348941312200305.
4
Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jun 19;62(6):1707-1718. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0507. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1887-96. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0294). Epub 2012 May 21.
7
The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Sep;144(3):1643. doi: 10.1121/1.5055234.
8
The Effect of Rating Method on Reliability of Judgments of Strain Across Populations.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jan 3;33(1):393-405. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00174. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
10
Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1426-1433. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0103.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Weeklong Ambulatory Vocal Behavior Between Female Patients With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Controls.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):372-384. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00065. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Developing Clinically Relevant Scales of Breathy and Rough Voice Quality.
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):663.e9-663.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
4
Categorization in the Perception of Breathy Voice Quality and Its Relation to Voice Production in Healthy Speakers.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3655-3666. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0048. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Sep;144(3):1643. doi: 10.1121/1.5055234.
6
A Two-Stage Cepstral Analysis Procedure for the Classification of Rough Voices.
J Voice. 2020 Jan;34(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
7
Objective Indices of Perceived Vocal Strain.
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):838-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
Relative Fundamental Frequency Distinguishes Between Phonotraumatic and Non-Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 10;60(6):1507-1515. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0262.
9
Exploring the Clinical Utility of Relative Fundamental Frequency as an Objective Measure of Vocal Hyperfunction.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Oct 1;59(5):1002-1017. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0354.
10
A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
J Voice. 2017 May;31(3):387.e1-387.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验