• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聆听者经验、测量尺度和言语任务对嗓音质量听觉感知评估可靠性的影响。

The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.

机构信息

Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2024 Apr 15;36(3):e20230175. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175
PMID:38629682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11065405/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of the listener experience, measurement scales and the type of speech task on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of the overall severity (OS) of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice (rough, breathy or strain).

METHODS

22 listeners, divided into four groups participated in the study: speech-language pathologist specialized in voice (SLP-V), SLP non specialized in voice (SLP-NV), graduate students with auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-T), and graduate students without auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-U). The subjects rated the OS of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice of 44 voices by visual analog scale (VAS) and the numerical scale (score "G" from GRBAS), corresponding to six speech tasks such as sustained vowel /a/ and /ɛ/, sentences, number counting, running speech, and all five previous tasks together.

RESULTS

Sentences obtained the best interrater reliability in each group, using both VAS and GRBAS. SLP-NV group demonstrated the best interrater reliability in OS judgment in different speech tasks using VAS or GRBAS. Sustained vowel (/a/ and /ɛ/) and running speech obtained the best interrater reliability among the groups of listeners in judging the predominant vocal quality. GS-T group got the best result of interrater reliability in judging the predominant vocal quality.

CONCLUSION

The time of experience in the auditory-perceptual judgment of the voice, the type of training to which they were submitted, and the type of speech task influence the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.

摘要

目的

评估听众经验、测量尺度和言语任务类型对嗓音障碍整体严重程度（OS）和主要嗓音类型（粗糙、气息声或紧张）的听觉感知评估的影响。

方法

22 名听众分为四个组参与研究：专门从事嗓音的言语语言病理学家（SLP-V）、不专门从事嗓音的言语语言病理学家（SLP-NV）、接受过听觉感知分析培训的研究生（GS-T）和未接受过听觉感知分析培训的研究生（GS-U）。受试者通过视觉模拟量表（VAS）和数字量表（GRBAS 的“G”评分）对 44 个嗓音的 OS 进行评估，并对 6 种言语任务（如持续元音/a/和/ɛ/、句子、数字计数、连续言语和之前的所有 5 种任务）进行评估。

结果

句子在每个组中使用 VAS 和 GRBAS 均获得最佳的组内可靠性。SLP-NV 组在使用 VAS 或 GRBAS 对不同言语任务中的 OS 判断方面表现出最佳的组内可靠性。在判断主要嗓音质量方面，持续元音（/a/和/ɛ/）和连续言语获得了最佳的组内可靠性。在判断主要嗓音质量方面，GS-T 组获得了最佳的组内可靠性。

结论

在嗓音的听觉感知判断方面的经验时间、所接受的培训类型以及言语任务的类型影响嗓音质量的听觉感知评估的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/b048f9840c83/codas-36-3-e20230175-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/04a5d4240aa1/codas-36-3-e20230175-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/61f40d77f704/codas-36-3-e20230175-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/fe23ecb7e0d8/codas-36-3-e20230175-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/b048f9840c83/codas-36-3-e20230175-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/04a5d4240aa1/codas-36-3-e20230175-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/61f40d77f704/codas-36-3-e20230175-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/fe23ecb7e0d8/codas-36-3-e20230175-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f213/11065405/b048f9840c83/codas-36-3-e20230175-g04.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.聆听者经验、测量尺度和言语任务对嗓音质量听觉感知评估可靠性的影响。
Codas. 2024 Apr 15;36(3):e20230175. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175. eCollection 2024.
2
Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.感知语音评估中的言语任务与评分者间信度
J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 May 17.
3
The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.母语对巴西和加拿大语言病理学家完成的语音样本听觉感知评估的影响。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):258.e1-258.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
4
GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.GRBAS 和 Cape-V 量表：在不同时间应用时具有高度可靠性和一致性。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
5
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
Auditory Perception of Roughness and Breathiness by Dysphonic Women.嗓音粗糙和气息声感知的研究：嗓音障碍女性的感知。
J Voice. 2024 Sep;38(5):1249.e1-1249.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
7
Auditory Skills as a Predictor of Rater Reliability in the Evaluation of Vocal Quality.听觉技能在评估嗓音质量的评分者可靠性中的预测作用。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):559-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.020. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Perceptual Error Identification of Human and Synthesized Voices.人类声音与合成声音的感知错误识别
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):639.e17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
9
The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.视觉排序与速率评分法和视觉类比评分法对嗓音障碍判断可靠性的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 May 11;64(5):1571-1580. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00623. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function.推荐的嗓音仪器评估方案：美国言语语言听力协会专家小组制定嗓音功能仪器评估方案。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Aug 6;27(3):887-905. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009.
2
The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).嗓音的共识性听觉感知评估（CAPE-V）心理测量特征：II 欧洲葡萄牙语版（II EP CAPE-V）。
J Voice. 2019 Jul;33(4):582.e5-582.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
[Not Available].
[不可用]。
J Vasc Bras. 2016 Apr-Jun;15(2):89-92. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.004216.
4
The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.语音样本长度对整体语音质量听觉感知判断的影响。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Auditory-perceptual evaluation of rough and breathy voices: correspondence between analogical visual and numerical scale.粗糙嗓音与呼吸音的听觉感知评估：类比视觉量表与数字量表之间的对应关系
Codas. 2016 Apr;28(2):163-7. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015098.
7
Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.使用嗓音偏差量表对正常嗓音和发声障碍嗓音进行听觉-感知评估。
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
Characterization Methods for the Detection of Multiple Voice Disorders: Neurological, Functional, and Laryngeal Diseases.多种嗓音障碍的检测特征方法：神经、功能和喉部疾病。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015 Nov;19(6):1820-8. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2467375. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Auditory-perceptual evaluation of the degree of vocal deviation: correlation between the Visual Analogue Scale and Numerical Scale.嗓音偏差程度的听觉感知评估：视觉模拟量表与数字量表之间的相关性。
Codas. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):279-84. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014167.
10
Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art.嗓音质量评估：当前的技术水平。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Jun;42(3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 28.