Suppr超能文献

急诊科常规数据与不典型胸痛患者急性缺血性心脏病的诊断。

Emergency department routine data and the diagnosis of acute ischemic heart disease in patients with atypical chest pain.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241920. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to an aging population and the increasing proportion of patients with various comorbidities, the number of patients with acute ischemic heart disease (AIHD) who present to the emergency department (ED) with atypical chest pain is increasing. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prediction model for AIHD in patients with atypical chest pain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A chest pain workup registry, ED administrative database, and clinical data warehouse database were analyzed and integrated by using nonidentifiable key factors to create a comprehensive clinical dataset in a single academic ED from 2014 to 2018. Demographic findings, vital signs, and routine laboratory test results were assessed for their ability to predict AIHD. An extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model was developed and evaluated, and its performance was compared to that of a single-variable model and logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess discrimination. A calibration plot and partial dependence plots were also used in the analyses. Overall, 4,978 patients were analyzed. Of the 3,833 patients in the training cohort, 453 (11.8%) had AIHD; of the 1,145 patients in the validation cohort, 166 (14.5%) had AIHD. XGB, troponin (single-variable), and logistic regression models showed similar discrimination power (AUROC [95% confidence interval]: XGB model, 0.75 [0.71-0.79]; troponin model, 0.73 [0.69-0.77]; logistic regression model, 0.73 [0.70-0.79]). Most patients were classified as non-AIHD; calibration was good in patients with a low predicted probability of AIHD in all prediction models. Unlike in the logistic regression model, a nonlinear relationship-like threshold and U-shaped relationship between variables and the probability of AIHD were revealed in the XGB model.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated an AIHD prediction model for patients with atypical chest pain by using an XGB model.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化和患有各种合并症的患者比例不断增加,因非典型胸痛而到急诊科就诊的急性缺血性心脏病(AIHD)患者数量正在增加。本研究旨在为非典型胸痛患者开发和验证 AIHD 预测模型。

方法和结果

对 2014 年至 2018 年期间来自单一学术急诊科的胸痛评估登记处、急诊科管理数据库和临床数据仓库数据库进行了分析和整合,通过使用不可识别的关键因素创建了一个综合临床数据集。评估了人口统计学发现、生命体征和常规实验室检测结果对 AIHD 的预测能力。开发并评估了极端梯度增强(XGB)模型,并将其性能与单变量模型和逻辑回归模型进行了比较。计算了接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)以评估区分能力。还在分析中使用了校准图和部分依赖图。共有 4978 例患者进行了分析。在训练队列的 3833 例患者中,有 453 例(11.8%)患有 AIHD;在验证队列的 1145 例患者中,有 166 例(14.5%)患有 AIHD。XGB、肌钙蛋白(单变量)和逻辑回归模型的区分能力相似(AUROC[95%置信区间]:XGB 模型,0.75[0.71-0.79];肌钙蛋白模型,0.73[0.69-0.77];逻辑回归模型,0.73[0.70-0.79])。大多数患者被归类为非 AIHD;在所有预测模型中,对于 AIHD 预测概率较低的患者,校准效果都很好。与逻辑回归模型不同,XGB 模型揭示了变量与 AIHD 概率之间的非线性关系,如阈值和 U 形关系。

结论

我们使用 XGB 模型为非典型胸痛患者开发并验证了 AIHD 预测模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c50/7644067/ee41e8722af7/pone.0241920.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验