Dorow P, Steinijans V W
Department of Cardiology, University Clinics Charlottenburg, Free University, Berlin, F.R.G.
Chronobiol Int. 1987;4(3):349-57. doi: 10.3109/07420528709083524.
Two theophylline treatments were compared in a randomized, multiple-dose, crossover study on 20 patients present with nonallergic bronchial asthma. Both products (E = Euphyllin CR, A = Afonilum Retard) were capsules containing micropellets. They were administered according to the recommendations of the manufactures and differed in the total daily theophylline dose (642 mg versus 500 mg), the partition of this dose (1/3 in the morning and 2/3 in the evening versus equal amounts in the morning and evening) and the timing of the evening dose (2200 hr versus 2000 hr). The patients were off oral theophyllines at least 2 days prior to study onset and no other drugs were allowed to be administered during the testing periods. On the 4th day of each study period, serum theophylline concentrations (STC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) were determined every 2 hr. Compared with the 24-hr PEF reference profile taken prior to study onset, both theophylline treatments produced a significantly higher 24-hr PEF average (mesor). Treatment E resulted in significantly higher mesor than A; in addition, the PEF amplitude relative to the mesor was reduced by treatment E when compared with placebo.
在一项针对20例非过敏性支气管哮喘患者的随机、多剂量、交叉研究中,对两种茶碱治疗方法进行了比较。两种产品(E = 氨茶碱控释片,A = 氨茶碱缓释片)均为含有微丸的胶囊。它们按照制造商的建议给药,在每日总茶碱剂量(642毫克对500毫克)、该剂量的分配(早上1/3,晚上2/3对早晚等量)以及晚上剂量的给药时间(22:00对20:00)方面有所不同。患者在研究开始前至少停用口服茶碱2天,且在测试期间不允许使用其他药物。在每个研究周期的第4天,每2小时测定一次血清茶碱浓度(STC)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)。与研究开始前测得的24小时PEF参考曲线相比,两种茶碱治疗方法均使24小时PEF平均值(中值)显著升高。治疗E产生的中值显著高于A;此外,与安慰剂相比,治疗E使相对于中值的PEF幅度降低。