• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

温和派的怀疑论者:与德里克·博尔顿博士的访谈。

Scepticism of the gentle variety: interview with Derek Bolton, PhD.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Northcoast Behavioral Healthcare (Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services), Northfield, OH, USA.

出版信息

Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;33(5):458-462. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1800600. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1080/09540261.2020.1800600
PMID:33153334
Abstract

This interview with Derek Bolton, PhD, goes into a discussion of his philosophical work on the diagnosis and definition of mental disorder, the basis of the standards or norms by which we judge that a person has a mental disorder, and the validity of the distinction between abnormal and normal mental functioning. Bolton argues that the notion that emerges from a conceptual analysis of psychiatry's diagnostic manuals is not a naturalist notion of disorder, but one that is focussed on harm and suffering, and in which the personal, the social and the biological cannot be clearly distinguished. The implications of this thinking with regards to the relationship between the medical model and the psychological approaches are also discussed. His most recent philosophical work reconceptualizes the biopsychosocial model as a philosophical theory of biopsychosocial causal interactions and he argues that there are causal regulatory functions within the psychological domain, and this is so independent of whether they can be captured by a physicochemical description of brain processes.

摘要

这段访谈深入探讨了德里克·博尔顿博士(Derek Bolton)在精神障碍的诊断和定义方面的哲学工作,包括我们用于判断一个人是否患有精神障碍的标准或规范的基础,以及异常和正常心理功能之间的区别的有效性。博尔顿认为,从精神病学诊断手册的概念分析中得出的概念并不是一种自然主义的紊乱概念,而是一种关注伤害和痛苦的概念,在这种概念中,个人、社会和生物因素无法明确区分。这种思维方式对于医学模式和心理方法之间的关系也有影响。他最近的哲学工作将生物心理社会模型重新概念化为生物心理社会因果相互作用的哲学理论,并认为心理领域存在因果调节功能,这与大脑过程的物理化学描述是否能够捕捉到这些功能无关。

相似文献

1
Scepticism of the gentle variety: interview with Derek Bolton, PhD.温和派的怀疑论者:与德里克·博尔顿博士的访谈。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;33(5):458-462. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1800600. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
Mental disorder and social deviance.精神障碍与社会偏差。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;33(5):478-485. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1815666. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Medicalization in psychiatry: the medical model, descriptive diagnosis, and lost knowledge.精神病学中的医学化:医学模式、描述性诊断与失落的知识。
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Jun;19(2):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9670-5.
4
To reduce or to integrate: psychiatry's dilemma.减少还是整合:精神病学的困境。
Can J Psychiatry. 1986 May;31(4):347-51. doi: 10.1177/070674378603100414.
5
[Are Mental Disorders Natural Kinds?].[精神障碍是自然类别吗?]
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2015 Jan-Mar;44(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
6
[The contribution of neuroscience to the concept of mental disorder].[神经科学对精神障碍概念的贡献]
Nervenarzt. 2015 Jan;86(1):22-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-014-4113-8.
7
Psychiatric disorders as an imperfect community: interview with Peter Zachar, PhD.精神障碍作为一个不完美的共同体:对 Peter Zachar 博士的采访
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;33(5):452-457. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1800598. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
Reconsidering harm in psychiatric manuals within an explicationist framework.在释义学框架内重新考虑精神病学手册中的伤害。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Jun;25(2):239-249. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10064-x. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
The importance and limits of harm in identifying mental disorder.识别精神障碍中的伤害的重要性和局限性。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;58(11):618-21. doi: 10.1177/070674371305801107.
10
Philosophy and the DSM-III.哲学与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版
Compr Psychiatry. 1991 Sep-Oct;32(5):404-15. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(91)90017-7.