Sedler Mark J
Psychiatry and Public Health, Global Medical Education, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, L-4, Rm. 158, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8432, USA.
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Jun;19(2):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9670-5.
Medicalization was the theme of the 29th European Conference on Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care that included a panel session on the DSM and mental health. Philosophical critiques of the medical model in psychiatry suffer from endemic assumptions that fail to acknowledge the real world challenges of psychiatric nosology. The descriptive model of classification of the DSM 3-5 serves a valid purpose in the absence of known etiologies for the majority of psychiatric conditions. However, a consequence of the "atheoretical" approach of the DSM is rampant epistemological confusion, a shortcoming that can be ameliorated by importing perspectives from the work of Jaspers and McHugh. Finally, contemporary psychiatry's over-reliance on neuroscience and pharmacotherapy has led to a reductionist agenda that is antagonistic to the inherently pluralistic nature of psychiatry. As a result, the field has suffered a loss of knowledge that may be difficult to recover.
医学化是第29届欧洲医学与医疗保健哲学会议的主题,该会议包括一场关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)和心理健康的小组讨论。对精神病学医学模式的哲学批判存在一些根深蒂固的假设,这些假设未能认识到精神病分类学在现实世界中面临的挑战。在大多数精神疾病的病因尚不明确的情况下,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第3 - 5版的描述性分类模型发挥着有效的作用。然而,DSM的“无理论”方法导致了认识论上的混乱盛行,这一缺点可以通过引入雅斯贝尔斯和麦克休著作中的观点来改善。最后,当代精神病学对神经科学和药物治疗的过度依赖导致了一种还原论议程,这与精神病学固有的多元性本质背道而驰。结果,该领域遭受了知识损失,可能难以恢复。