Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Panel Chair, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov;17(11S):S355-S366. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.014.
Acute injuries to the ankle are frequently encountered in the setting of the emergency room, sport, and general practice. This ACR Appropriateness Criteria defines best practices for imaging evaluation for several variants of patients presenting with acute ankle trauma. The variants include scenarios when Ottawa Rules can be evaluated, when there are exclusionary criteria, when Ottawa Rules cannot be evaluated, as well as specific injuries. Clinical scenarios are followed by the imaging choices and their appropriateness with an accompanying narrative explanation to help physicians to order the most appropriate imaging test. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
踝关节急性损伤在急诊室、运动和一般实践中经常遇到。本 ACR 适宜性标准为几种不同踝关节急性创伤患者的影像评估定义了最佳实践。这些变体包括可以评估渥太华规则的情况、有排除标准的情况、不能评估渥太华规则的情况以及特定损伤的情况。临床情况后面是影像学选择及其适宜性,并附有伴随的叙述性解释,以帮助医生选择最合适的影像学检查。美国放射学院适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的循证指南,每年由多学科专家小组进行审查。指南的制定和修订包括对同行评议期刊的现有医学文献进行广泛分析,并应用成熟的方法(RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和推荐评估、制定和评估分级或 GRADE)对特定临床情况的影像学和治疗程序的适宜性进行评分。在缺乏证据或证据存在争议的情况下,专家意见可以补充现有证据,以推荐影像学或治疗。