Department of Biochemistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Campus), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Department of Global Health, Prasanna School of Public Health, MSW Program, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Oct-Dec;27(4):343-347. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_148_20.
Cervical cancer health education programmes are not accessible to rural women in developing countries.
Our study aimed at assessing the health literacy about cervical cancer amongst the rural women in Udupi district, southern India, before and following intervention using audio-visual aid/face-to-face interactive sessions versus pamphlets alone.
This was a quasi-experimental study. A total of 166 women participated in the study. Participant groups were allocated into two interventional (Experimental/Control) groups. Participants in the experimental group received education through the video followed by face-to-face interaction with a health educator while those in the control group received a pamphlet. A validated questionnaire was used to assess knowledge about numerous risk factors, Pap smear test and treatment of cervical cancer (pre- and post-intervention test). The findings are presented as frequencies and percentages. Paired responses were compared for individual questions using McNemar test and P < 0.05 was fixed as statistically significant.
Former to the intervention, 13.5% and 19.1% in the experimental and control groups, respectively, felt that personal hygiene was important to prevent cervical cancer. Both the groups had very limited knowledge regarding risk factors (93.6%; 94%), symptoms (96.3%; 97.6%) and knowledge that Pap smears can reduce the risk of cervical cancer (91.7%; 93.9%). The change in knowledge pre-and post-intervention in both groups increased significantly.
Intervention with face-to-face interactive sessions showed a positive impact on knowledge regarding cervical cancer. These findings indicate both methods can be effective in providing health education in the community.
发展中国家的农村妇女无法获得宫颈癌健康教育计划。
我们的研究旨在评估印度南部乌杜皮地区农村妇女的宫颈癌健康素养,在使用视听辅助/面对面互动与仅使用小册子进行干预之前和之后。
这是一项准实验研究。共有 166 名妇女参加了这项研究。将参与者分为两组干预组(实验组/对照组)。实验组通过视频接受教育,然后与健康教育者进行面对面互动,而对照组则收到小册子。使用经过验证的问卷评估对许多危险因素、巴氏涂片检查和宫颈癌治疗(干预前后测试)的知识。结果以频率和百分比表示。使用 McNemar 检验比较个体问题的配对反应,固定 P<0.05 为统计学显著。
在干预之前,实验组和对照组分别有 13.5%和 19.1%的人认为个人卫生对预防宫颈癌很重要。两组对危险因素(93.6%;94%)、症状(96.3%;97.6%)和巴氏涂片检查可降低宫颈癌风险的知识(91.7%;93.9%)的了解都非常有限。两组在干预前后的知识变化均显著增加。
面对面互动的干预对宫颈癌相关知识产生了积极影响。这些发现表明,这两种方法都可以有效地在社区中提供健康教育。