Suppr超能文献

[颈动脉传统多普勒超声检查中出现误差的可能性]

[Possibility of errors in conventional Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries].

作者信息

Nichtweiss M, Wiegand C, Wuppermann T

机构信息

Neurologische Klinik, Universität Frankfurt.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1987 Nov 20;112(47):1807-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068332.

Abstract

Results of Doppler sonography and angiography were compared in 100 consecutive patients with ischaemia in the area of carotid arterial supply. In 15 there were important differences. Three Doppler "occlusions" were angiographically demonstrated to be carotid arterial stenoses; significant additional information was provided by angiography in two patients with stenoses at the origin of the internal carotid artery, while in ten--despite unremarkable Doppler findings--angiography revealed disease in the carotids.

摘要

对100例连续性颈动脉供血区缺血患者的多普勒超声检查和血管造影结果进行了比较。其中15例存在显著差异。3例多普勒显示的“闭塞”经血管造影证实为颈动脉狭窄;血管造影为2例颈内动脉起始处狭窄患者提供了重要的额外信息,而另外10例患者尽管多普勒检查结果无异常,但血管造影显示颈动脉存在病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验