文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

GIQuIC 全国质量登记处的分析显示,Z 线正常和不规则的患者进行了不必要的监测内镜检查。

An Analysis of the GIQuIC Nationwide Quality Registry Reveals Unnecessary Surveillance Endoscopies in Patients With Normal and Irregular Z-Lines.

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;115(11):1869-1878. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000960.


DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000960
PMID:33156106
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Population-based estimates of adherence to Barrett's esophagus (BE) guidelines are not available. Using a national registry, we assessed surveillance intervals for patients with normal and irregular Z-lines based on the presence or absence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and among patients with suspected or confirmed BE. METHODS: We analyzed data from the GI Quality Improvement Consortium Registry. Endoscopy data, including procedure indication, demographics, endoscopy and histology findings, and recommendations for further endoscopy, were assessed from January 2013 through December 2019. Patients with an indication of BE screening or surveillance or an endoscopic finding of BE were included. Biopsy and surveillance practices were assessed based on the length of columnar epithelium (0 cm, <1 cm, 1-3 cm, and >3 cm) and diagnosis based on histology findings. RESULTS: A total of 1,907,801 endoscopies were assessed; 135,704 endoscopies (7.1%) performed in 114,894 patients met the inclusion criteria (men 61.4%, Whites 91%, and mean age of 61.7 years [SD 12.5]). Among patients with normal Z-lines, surveillance endoscopy was recommended for 81% of patients with IM and 20% of individuals without IM. Among patients with irregular Z-lines, surveillance endoscopy was recommended for 81% with IM and 24% without IM. Approximately 30% of patients with confirmed nondysplastic BE (lengths 1-3 and >3 cm) had recommended surveillance intervals of <3 years. DISCUSSION: An analysis of data from a nationwide quality registry demonstrated that patients without BE are receiving recommendations for surveillance endoscopies and many patients with nondysplastic BE are reexamined too soon.

摘要

简介:目前尚无基于人群的 Barrett 食管(BE)指南依从性估计数据。本研究使用国家登记处,根据是否存在肠上皮化生(IM)以及疑似或确诊 BE 患者,评估了具有正常和不规则 Z 线的患者的监测间隔。

方法:我们分析了 GI 质量改进联盟登记处的数据。从 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,评估了内镜数据,包括程序指征、人口统计学、内镜和组织学结果以及进一步内镜检查的建议。纳入有 BE 筛查或监测指征或内镜发现 BE 的患者。根据柱状上皮长度(0 cm、<1 cm、1-3 cm 和>3 cm)和组织学发现诊断评估活检和监测实践。

结果:共评估了 1,907,801 例内镜检查;114,894 例患者的 135,704 例内镜检查(7.1%)符合纳入标准(男性 61.4%,白人 91%,平均年龄 61.7 岁[SD 12.5])。在 Z 线正常的患者中,IM 患者推荐 81%进行监测性内镜检查,而无 IM 患者为 20%。在 Z 线不规则的患者中,IM 患者推荐 81%进行监测性内镜检查,无 IM 患者为 24%。约 30%的非异型增生 BE(长度 1-3 和>3 cm)患者的推荐随访间隔<3 年。

讨论:对全国质量登记处数据的分析表明,没有 BE 的患者接受了监测性内镜检查的建议,许多非异型增生 BE 患者的检查过于频繁。

相似文献

[1]
An Analysis of the GIQuIC Nationwide Quality Registry Reveals Unnecessary Surveillance Endoscopies in Patients With Normal and Irregular Z-Lines.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2020-11

[2]
Over-Utilization of Repeat Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Non-dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: A Quality Registry Study.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2019-8

[3]
Negative surveillance endoscopy occurs frequently in patients with short-segment non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Dis Esophagus. 2015-10

[4]
Racial Disparities in Adherence to Quality Indicators in Barrett's Esophagus: An Analysis Using the GIQuIC National Benchmarking Registry.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021-6-1

[5]
Does Risk of Progression from Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Change Based on the Number of Non-dysplastic Endoscopies?

Dig Dis Sci. 2021-6

[6]
Surveillance in Barrett's esophagus: an audit of practice.

Dig Dis Sci. 2009-8-11

[7]
Use of a Cytosponge biomarker panel to prioritise endoscopic Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: a cross-sectional study followed by a real-world prospective pilot.

Lancet Oncol. 2022-2

[8]
Use of Appropriate Surveillance for Patients With Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018-2-9

[9]
Overutilization of endoscopic surveillance in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a multicenter study.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011-11-17

[10]
Endoscopists systematically undersample patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus: an analysis of biopsy sampling practices from a quality improvement registry.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2019-5-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Value of HCC surveillance in a landscape of emerging surveillance options: Perspectives of a multi-stakeholder modified Delphi panel.

Hepatology. 2025-9-1

[2]
Prevalence of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with irregular Z-line: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Endosc. 2025-5

[3]
High Risk of Persistence and Risk of Dysplasia After Diagnosis of Ultrashort Barrett's Esophagus.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2025-3-7

[4]
Irregular Z-Line: To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy?

Dig Dis Sci. 2024-8

[5]
Adjunctive Use of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling-3D in Patients With Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Increases Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Dysplasia.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2024-10-1

[6]
Prevalence and Predictors of Barrett's Esophagus After Negative Initial Endoscopy: Analysis From Two National Databases.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-3

[7]
Unmet needs in Barret's esophagus diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review.

Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023-6-15

[8]
Mechanisms and pathophysiology of Barrett oesophagus.

Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022-9

[9]
Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Dig Dis Sci. 2022-5

[10]
The evolution of endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021-10-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索