• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族差异对巴雷特食管质量指标的依从性:使用 GIQuIC 国家基准注册分析。

Racial Disparities in Adherence to Quality Indicators in Barrett's Esophagus: An Analysis Using the GIQuIC National Benchmarking Registry.

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1201-1210. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001230.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001230
PMID:33767105
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Racial disparities in outcomes in esophageal adenocarcinoma are well established. Using a nationwide registry, we aimed to compare clinical and endoscopic characteristics of blacks and whites with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and adherence to defined quality indicators.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium Registry between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with an indication of BE screening or surveillance, or an endoscopic finding of BE, were included. Adherence to recommended endoscopic surveillance intervals of 3-5 years for nondysplastic BE and adherence to Seattle biopsy protocol were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess variables associated with adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 100,848 esophagogastroduodenoscopies in 84,789 patients met inclusion criteria (blacks-3,957 and whites-96,891). Blacks were less likely to have histologically confirmed BE (34.3% vs 51.7%, P < 0.01), had shorter BE lengths (1.61 vs 2.35 cm, P < 0.01), and were less likely to have any dysplasia (4.3% vs 7.1%, P < 0.01). Although whites were predominantly male (62.2%), about half of blacks with BE were female (53.0%). Blacks with nondysplastic BE were less likely to be recommended appropriate surveillance intervals (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.89). Adherence rates to the Seattle protocol were modestly higher among blacks overall (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.20), although significantly lower among blacks with BE segments >6 cm.

DISCUSSION

The use of sex as a risk factor for BE screening may be inappropriate among blacks. Fewer blacks were recommended appropriate surveillance intervals, and blacks with longer segment BE were less likely to undergo Seattle biopsy protocol.

摘要

简介

食管腺癌的结局存在明显的种族差异。本研究利用全国性登记处的数据,旨在比较黑人与白人 Barrett 食管(BE)患者的临床和内镜特征,并评估其对既定质量指标的依从性。

方法

我们分析了 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间胃肠质量改进联盟登记处的数据。纳入行食管胃十二指肠镜检查且有 BE 筛查或监测指征,或内镜发现 BE 的患者。评估无异型增生 BE 的推荐内镜监测间隔(3-5 年)和西雅图活检方案的依从性。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估与依从性相关的变量。

结果

共纳入 84789 例患者的 100848 次食管胃十二指肠镜检查(黑人 3957 例,白人 96891 例)。黑人患者组织学证实 BE 的比例较低(34.3% vs. 51.7%,P < 0.01),BE 长度较短(1.61 cm vs. 2.35 cm,P < 0.01),且任何程度异型增生的比例较低(4.3% vs. 7.1%,P < 0.01)。虽然白人患者以男性为主(62.2%),但约一半的黑人 BE 患者为女性(53.0%)。无异型增生 BE 的黑人患者推荐适当监测间隔的可能性较低(比值比 0.78;95%可信区间 0.68-0.89)。总体而言,黑人患者接受西雅图方案的比例略高(比值比 1.12;95%可信区间 1.04-1.20),但 BE 段长度>6 cm 的黑人患者接受西雅图方案的比例显著较低。

讨论

将性别作为 BE 筛查的危险因素可能不适用于黑人。黑人患者推荐适当监测间隔的比例较低,且 BE 段较长的黑人患者更不可能接受西雅图活检方案。

相似文献

1
Racial Disparities in Adherence to Quality Indicators in Barrett's Esophagus: An Analysis Using the GIQuIC National Benchmarking Registry.种族差异对巴雷特食管质量指标的依从性:使用 GIQuIC 国家基准注册分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1201-1210. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001230.
2
Wide Variability in Dysplasia Detection Rate and Adherence to Seattle Protocol and Surveillance Recommendations in Barrett's Esophagus: A Population-Based Analysis Using the GIQuIC National Quality Benchmarking Registry.巴雷特食管中异型增生检出率和对西雅图协议及监测建议的依从性存在广泛差异:使用 GIQuIC 国家质量基准注册表进行的基于人群的分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 1;118(5):900-904. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002102. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
3
An Analysis of the GIQuIC Nationwide Quality Registry Reveals Unnecessary Surveillance Endoscopies in Patients With Normal and Irregular Z-Lines.GIQuIC 全国质量登记处的分析显示,Z 线正常和不规则的患者进行了不必要的监测内镜检查。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;115(11):1869-1878. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000960.
4
Over-Utilization of Repeat Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Non-dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: A Quality Registry Study.非异型增生性 Barrett 食管患者重复上内窥镜检查过度使用:质量登记研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;114(8):1256-1264. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000184.
5
Endoscopists systematically undersample patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus: an analysis of biopsy sampling practices from a quality improvement registry.内镜医师系统地对长段 Barrett 食管患者进行抽样检查:来自质量改进登记处的活检抽样实践分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Nov;90(5):732-741.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.250. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Adherence to clinical guidelines for Barrett's esophagus.对巴雷特食管临床指南的遵循情况。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;54(8):945-952. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1641740. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus compared between African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites.非裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人之间 Barrett 食管的风险因素比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1870-80. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.351. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
Diagnosis and Management of Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review From the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association.巴雷特食管低级别异型增生的诊断和管理:美国胃肠病学会临床实践更新委员会的专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Nov;151(5):822-835. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.040. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
9
Frequency of endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's esophagus is influenced by health insurance status: results from a population-based analysis.巴雷特食管内镜监测的频率受健康保险状况影响:基于人群分析的结果
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Nov 1;30(11):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox080.
10
Racial Disparity in the Sex Distribution, the Prevalence, and the Incidence of Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus.巴雷特食管发育异常在性别分布、患病率及发病率方面的种族差异
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 May/Jun;51(5):402-406. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000559.

引用本文的文献

1
Revealing New Patterns in Colorectal Cancer Screening with a Focus on a Younger Patient Population.揭示结直肠癌筛查中的新模式,重点关注年轻患者群体。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 16;17(10):1686. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101686.
2
Endoscopic Surveillance of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.胃化生的内镜监测:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 17. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002039.
3
Exploring the Incidence and Associated Risk Factors of Barrett's Esophagus in African Americans: A Retrospective Study.
探索非裔美国人巴雷特食管的发病率及相关危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Rep Glob Health Res. 2023;6(3). doi: 10.29011/2690-9480.100164. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Prevalence and Predictors of Barrett's Esophagus After Negative Initial Endoscopy: Analysis From Two National Databases.初次内镜阴性后 Barrett 食管的流行率及其预测因素:来自两个国家数据库的分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;22(3):523-531.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.08.035. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
5
Management of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus: When to survey? When to ablate?非发育异常性巴雷特食管的管理:何时进行监测?何时进行消融?
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Apr 12;13:20406223221086760. doi: 10.1177/20406223221086760. eCollection 2022.