• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科手术后患者无阿片类药物处方出院的安全性和可行性。

Safety and Feasibility of Discharge Without an Opioid Prescription for Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery.

机构信息

NYU Langone Health and NYU Langone Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York New York.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1126-1134. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004158.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004158
PMID:33156191
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To implement a quality-improvement intervention aimed at reducing unnecessary opioid prescriptions for patients who are undergoing gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included data from the pre- and post-quality-improvement initiative cohorts. Patients at an urban, tertiary academic medical center who were undergoing scheduled minimally invasive surgery and open abdominal surgery by a gynecologic oncologist were included. Patients underwent preoperative counseling, standardization of perioperative analgesia, and a postoperative opioid prescribing algorithm. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic and perioperative characteristics, process measures, and outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 532 abdominal surgeries were analyzed. The total percentage of patients discharged with an opioid prescription decreased from 82.7% (n=229/276) to 23.1% (n=59/256) (P<.001) and was significantly reduced for all routes of surgery. The mean number of opioid tablets prescribed for all patients was significantly reduced from 7.2 tablets (SD=5.7) to 1.8 tablets (SD=4.3) (P<.001). Eighty-three percent of patients (n=97/117) who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy and were discharged on postoperative day 0 or day 1 were not provided an opioid prescription. Fifty-one percent of patients who underwent laparotomy were discharged without an opioid prescription. The percentage of patients who required an opioid refill or new prescription in the preintervention and postintervention cohorts remained constant (6.5%, n=18/276 vs 5.9%, n=15/256, P=.75), as did postoperative calls for pain (8.3%, n=23/276 vs 10.9%, n=33/256).

CONCLUSION

Patients who are undergoing scheduled abdominal gynecologic surgery can be safely discharged without opioid prescriptions with appropriate education and perioperative analgesia prescribing practices. These protocols and prescribing practices profoundly limit opioid prescriptions, which is an important factor in combating the ongoing opioid crisis.

摘要

目的

实施一项旨在减少妇科手术患者不必要的阿片类药物处方的质量改进干预措施。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括质量改进干预措施前和后队列的数据。纳入在城市三级学术医疗中心接受妇科肿瘤医生计划微创和开腹手术的患者。患者接受术前咨询、围手术期镇痛标准化和术后阿片类药物处方算法。计算人口统计学和围手术期特征、过程指标和结果指标的描述性统计数据。

结果

共分析了 532 例腹部手术。接受阿片类药物处方出院的患者总数百分比从 82.7%(n=229/276)降至 23.1%(n=59/256)(P<.001),所有手术途径的降幅均显著。所有患者开具的阿片类药物片剂数量从 7.2 片(SD=5.7)显著减少至 1.8 片(SD=4.3)(P<.001)。接受微创子宫切除术并在术后第 0 天或第 1 天出院的 117 例患者中有 83%(n=97)未开具阿片类药物处方。51%接受剖腹手术的患者未开具阿片类药物处方出院。在干预前和干预后队列中,需要阿片类药物续药或新处方的患者比例保持不变(6.5%,n=18/276 与 5.9%,n=15/256,P=.75),术后因疼痛致电的患者比例也保持不变(8.3%,n=23/276 与 10.9%,n=33/256)。

结论

接受计划腹部妇科手术的患者可以在接受适当的教育和围手术期镇痛处方实践后安全地不服用阿片类药物出院。这些方案和处方实践极大地限制了阿片类药物处方,这是对抗持续的阿片类药物危机的一个重要因素。

相似文献

1
Safety and Feasibility of Discharge Without an Opioid Prescription for Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery.妇科手术后患者无阿片类药物处方出院的安全性和可行性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1126-1134. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004158.
2
Ultrarestrictive Opioid Prescription Protocol for Pain Management After Gynecologic and Abdominal Surgery.妇科和腹部手术后疼痛管理的超限制阿片类药物处方方案。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5452.
3
A bundle of opioid-sparing strategies to eliminate routine opioid prescribing in a urogynecology practice.一整套阿片类药物节约策略,可消除妇科泌尿实践中的常规阿片类药物处方。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):278.e1-278.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.043. Epub 2024 May 25.
4
Opioid Prescription Usage after Benign Gynecologic Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.良性妇科手术后阿片类药物处方使用情况:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
5
Evaluation of a tiered opioid prescription algorithm in an ERAS pathway: exploring opportunities for further refinement.评估 ERAS 路径中的分层阿片类药物处方算法:探索进一步完善的机会。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Feb 5;34(2):251-259. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004948.
6
Pre-operative opioid use in gynecologic oncology: a common comorbidity relevant to the peri-operative period.妇科肿瘤患者术前使用阿片类药物:一种与围手术期相关的常见合并症。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1411-1416. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000508. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
7
Development of Multimodal Analgesia Pathways in Outpatient Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery and Association With Postoperative Opioid Prescription Patterns.门诊甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术中多模式镇痛途径的发展及其与术后阿片类药物处方模式的关系。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 1;144(11):1023-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0987.
8
Reducing Opioid Use in Endocrine Surgery Through Patient Education and Provider Prescribing Patterns.通过患者教育和医疗服务提供者的处方模式减少内分泌手术中的阿片类药物使用。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Trends in patient procurement of postoperative opioids and route of hysterectomy in the United States from 2004 through 2014.2004 年至 2014 年美国患者术后阿片类药物获取情况和子宫切除术途径的趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):484.e1-484.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
10
Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Opioid Prescriptions at Discharge From the Hospital: A Historical-Prospective Study.术后加速康复和非阿片类麻醉对出院时阿片类药物处方的影响:一项历史前瞻性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1784-1792. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002510.

引用本文的文献

1
Preemptive local analgesia at vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review.经阴道子宫切除术的预防性局部镇痛:系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Sep;33(9):2357-2366. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04999-1. Epub 2021 Dec 6.