Suppr超能文献

妇科和腹部手术后疼痛管理的超限制阿片类药物处方方案。

Ultrarestrictive Opioid Prescription Protocol for Pain Management After Gynecologic and Abdominal Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.

Department of Pharmacy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5452.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Opioids are routinely prescribed for postoperative home pain management for most patients in the United States, with limited evidence of the amount needed to be dispensed. Opioid-based treatment often adversely affects recovery. Prescribed opioids increase the risk of chronic opioid use, abuse, and diversion and contribute to the current opioid epidemic.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether after hospital discharge, postsurgical acute pain can be effectively managed with a markedly reduced number of opioid doses.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case-control cohort study, an ultrarestrictive opioid prescription protocol (UROPP) was designed and implemented from June 26, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at a single tertiary-care comprehensive cancer center. All patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery were included. Patients undergoing ambulatory or minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic approach) were not prescribed opioids at discharge unless they required more than 5 doses of oral or intravenous opioids while in the hospital. Patients who underwent a laparotomy were provided a 3-day opioid pain medication supply at discharge.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Total number of opioid pain medications prescribed in the 60-day perioperative period, requests for opioid prescription refills, and postoperative pain scores and complications were evaluated. Factors associated with increased postoperative pain, preoperative and postoperative pain scores, inpatient status, prior opioid use, and all opioid prescriptions within the 60-day perioperative window were monitored among the case patients and compared with those from consecutive control patients treated at the center in the 12 months before the UROPP was implemented.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and procedure characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 cohorts of women (605 cases: mean [SD] age, 56.3 [14.5] years; 626 controls: mean [SD] age, 55.5 [13.9] years). The mean (SD) number of opioid tablets given at discharge after a laparotomy was 43.6 (17.0) before implementation of the UROPP and 12.1 (8.9) after implementation (P < .001). For patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery, the mean (SD) number of opioid tablets given at discharge was 38.4 (17.4) before implementation of the UROPP and 1.3 (3.7) after implementation (P < .001). After ambulatory surgery, the mean (SD) number of opioid tablets given at discharge was 13.9 (16.6) before implementation of the UROPP and 0.2 (2.1) after implementation (P < .001). The mean (SD) perioperative oral morphine equivalent dose was reduced to 64.3 (207.2) mg from 339.4 (674.4) mg the year prior for all opioid-naive patients (P < .001). The significant reduction in the number of dispensed opioids was not associated with an increase the number of refill requests (104 patients [16.6%] in the pre-UROPP group vs 100 patients [16.5%] in the post-UROPP group; P = .99), the mean (SD) postoperative visit pain scores (1.1 [2.2] for the post-UROPP group vs 1.4 [2.3] for pre-UROPP group; P = .06), or the number of complications (29 cases [4.8%] in the post-UROPP group vs 42 cases [6.7%] in the pre-UROPP group; P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Implementation of a UROPP was associated with a significant decrease in the overall amount of opioids prescribed to patients after gynecologic and abdominal surgery at the time of discharge for all patients, and for the entire perioperative time for opioid-naive patients without changes in pain scores, complications, or medication refill requests.

摘要

重要性

在美国,大多数患者在术后家中进行疼痛管理时都常规开具阿片类药物,但开具的药物剂量却缺乏证据支持。阿片类药物治疗通常会对恢复产生不利影响。处方阿片类药物会增加慢性阿片类药物使用、滥用和转移的风险,并导致目前阿片类药物流行。

目的

评估在出院后,是否可以通过明显减少阿片类药物的剂量来有效管理术后急性疼痛。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项病例对照队列研究中,设计并实施了一种超限制阿片类药物处方方案(UROPP),该方案于 2017 年 6 月 26 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日在一家单一的三级综合癌症中心实施。所有接受妇科肿瘤手术的患者均被纳入研究。接受门诊或微创手术(腹腔镜或机器人方法)的患者在出院时不给予阿片类药物,除非他们在住院期间需要超过 5 剂口服或静脉用阿片类药物。接受剖腹手术的患者在出院时提供 3 天的阿片类止痛药供应。

主要结果和测量

评估了在围手术期的 60 天内开具的阿片类止痛药总数、阿片类药物处方的续开请求以及术后疼痛评分和并发症。监测了病例患者的以下因素:术后疼痛增加的相关因素、术前和术后疼痛评分、住院状态、术前阿片类药物使用情况以及围手术期 60 天内的所有阿片类药物处方,并与 UROPP 实施前中心连续 12 个月内接受治疗的连续对照患者进行比较。

结果

两组女性患者的患者人口统计学特征和手术特征无统计学差异(605 例患者:平均[标准差]年龄,56.3[14.5]岁;626 例对照患者:平均[标准差]年龄,55.5[13.9]岁)。在 UROPP 实施前,剖腹手术后出院时给予的阿片类药物片剂的平均(标准差)数量为 43.6(17.0)片,实施后为 12.1(8.9)片(P < .001)。对于接受腹腔镜或机器人手术的患者,在 UROPP 实施前,出院时给予的阿片类药物片剂的平均(标准差)数量为 38.4(17.4)片,实施后为 1.3(3.7)片(P < .001)。在门诊手术后,在 UROPP 实施前,出院时给予的阿片类药物片剂的平均(标准差)数量为 13.9(16.6)片,实施后为 0.2(2.1)片(P < .001)。所有阿片类药物初治患者的围手术期口服吗啡等效剂量从前一年的 339.4(674.4)mg 降至 64.3(207.2)mg(P < .001)。大量减少阿片类药物的处方数量与增加续开请求的数量无关(预 UROPP 组有 104 例患者[16.6%],UROPP 组有 100 例患者[16.5%];P = .99),术后就诊疼痛评分的平均(标准差)(UROPP 组为 1.1[2.2],预 UROPP 组为 1.4[2.3];P = .06),或并发症的数量(UROPP 组有 29 例患者[4.8%],预 UROPP 组有 42 例患者[6.7%];P = .15)。

结论和相关性

实施 UROPP 与妇科和腹部手术后所有患者出院时开具的阿片类药物总量显著减少相关,并且对于无疼痛评分、并发症或药物续开请求变化的阿片类药物初治患者,整个围手术期的阿片类药物用量也显著减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6324564/19aced5754c8/jamanetwopen-1-e185452-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验