Suppr超能文献

如何评估低收入环境下复杂卫生项目的实施情况:全球疫苗免疫联盟全面国家评估方法

How to evaluate the implementation of complex health programmes in low-income settings: the approach of the Gavi Full Country Evaluations.

作者信息

Soi Caroline, Shearer Jessica C, Budden Ashwin, Carnahan Emily, Salisbury Nicole, Asiimwe Gilbert, Chilundo Baltazar, Sarma Haribondhu, Gimbel Sarah, Simuyemba Moses, Uddin Jasim, Masiye Felix, Kamya Moses, Hozumi Dai, Rajaratnam Julie K, Lim Stephen S

机构信息

Health Alliance International, Mozambique and University of Washington, USA.

PATH.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_2):ii35-ii46. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa127.

Abstract

Vaccination, like most other public health services, relies on a complex package of intervention components, functioning systems and committed actors to achieve universal coverage. Despite significant investment in immunization programmes, national coverage trends have slowed and equity gaps have grown. This paper describes the design and implementation of the Gavi Full Country Evaluations, a multi-country, prospective, mixed-methods approach whose goal was to monitor and evaluate processes, inputs, outputs and outcomes of immunization programmes in Bangladesh, Mozambique, Uganda and Zambia. We implemented the Full Country Evaluations from 2013 to 2018 with the goal of identifying the drivers of immunization programme improvement to support programme implementation and increase equitable immunization coverage. The framework supported methodological and paradigmatic flexibility to respond to a broad range of evaluation and implementation research questions at global, national and cross-country levels, but was primarily underpinned by a focus on evaluating processes and identifying the root causes of implementation breakdowns. Process evaluation was driven by theories of change for each Gavi funding stream (e.g. Health Systems Strengthening) or activity, ranging from global policy development to district-level programme implementation. Mixing of methods increased in relevance and rigour over time as we learned to build multiple methods into increasingly tailored evaluation questions. Evaluation teams in country-based research institutes increasingly strengthened their level of embeddedness with immunization programmes as the emphasis shifted over time to focus more heavily on the use of findings for programme learning and adaptation. Based on our experiences implementing this approach, we recommend it for the evaluation of other complex interventions, health programmes or development assistance.

摘要

与大多数其他公共卫生服务一样,疫苗接种依赖于一系列复杂的干预措施、有效运行的系统以及敬业的行动者,以实现全民覆盖。尽管在免疫规划方面投入巨大,但国家覆盖率趋势有所放缓,公平差距不断扩大。本文介绍了全球疫苗免疫联盟国家全面评估(Gavi Full Country Evaluations)的设计与实施情况,这是一种多国、前瞻性、混合方法的评估方式,其目标是监测和评估孟加拉国、莫桑比克、乌干达和赞比亚免疫规划的过程、投入、产出及成果。我们在2013年至2018年实施了国家全面评估,目的是确定免疫规划改进的驱动因素,以支持规划实施并提高公平的免疫覆盖率。该框架支持方法和范式的灵活性,以应对全球、国家和跨国层面广泛的评估和实施研究问题,但主要侧重于评估过程并找出实施故障的根本原因。过程评估由每个全球疫苗免疫联盟资金流(如卫生系统加强)或活动的变革理论驱动,范围从全球政策制定到地区层面的规划实施。随着时间的推移,方法的混合在相关性和严谨性方面不断提高,因为我们学会将多种方法纳入日益量身定制的评估问题中。随着重点逐渐转向更加强调利用评估结果促进规划学习和调整,各国研究机构的评估团队与免疫规划的嵌入程度日益增强。基于我们实施这种方法的经验,我们建议将其用于评估其他复杂干预措施、卫生项目或发展援助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f1/7646739/fd1ee9ab0b79/czaa127f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验