Suppr超能文献

光动力和抗生素凝胶疗法作为机械清创辅助手段治疗糖尿病患者种植体周围炎的有效性。

The effectiveness of photodynamic and antibiotic gel therapy as an adjunct to mechanical debridement in the treatment of peri-implantitis among diabetic patients.

作者信息

Ahmed Paras, Bukhari Ishfaq A, Albaijan Refal, Sheikh Saeed A, Vohra Fahim

机构信息

Oral Medicine Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Dec;32:102077. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102077. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Abstract

AIM

The current clinical trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and adjunctive antibiotic gel therapy (aAGT) to treat peri-implantitis among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Selected T2DM participants with peri-implantitis were distributed into 3 groups: Group-1: received a single session of adjunctive (aPDT); Group-2: received a single session of adjunctive (aAGT) (metronidazole 400 mg and amoxicillin 500 mg); and Group-3: received MD alone. Clinical (probing depth [PD], bleeding on probing [BOP], and plaque scores [PS]) and radiographic (crestal bone loss [CBL]) peri-implant variables were recorded. Levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were assessed after the collection of peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF). All the evaluations were carried out at baseline, 3- and 6-months. The significance level was set to p < 0.05.

RESULTS

At 3-and 6-months of follow-up, all the three groups showed significant alleviation in PS (p < 0.05), BOP (p < 0.05), and PD (p < 0.05) when compared with the baseline. At baseline, no significant variation was observed in all clinical and radiographic peri-implant parameters among all three research groups. At 3-months follow-up, a considerable alleviation of in PS, BOP, PD, and CBL was noticeable in group-1 patients when compared with the baseline. At 6-months follow-up, a comparable difference was observed in BOP, PD, and CBL between group-1 and group-2. At baseline, no significant variation was observed in the PISF levels of IL-6 and TNF-α among all three research groups. At 3- and 6-months follow-up, a considerable alleviation of TNF-α and IL-6 levels was observed in group-1 and group-2 patients, respectively, when compared with the baseline.

CONCLUSION

The application of aPDT demonstrated improved clinical, radiographic, and immunological peri-implant parameters for the treatment of peri-implantitis among T2DM patients.

摘要

目的

当前的临床试验旨在评估辅助光动力疗法(aPDT)和辅助抗生素凝胶疗法(aAGT)治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者种植体周围炎的有效性。

方法

选择患有种植体周围炎的T2DM参与者并分为3组:第1组:接受单次辅助(aPDT)治疗;第2组:接受单次辅助(aAGT)治疗(甲硝唑400mg和阿莫西林500mg);第3组:仅接受甲硝唑治疗。记录临床(探诊深度[PD]、探诊出血[BOP]和菌斑评分[PS])和影像学(牙槽嵴骨吸收[CBL])种植体周围变量。在收集种植体周围龈沟液(PISF)后评估白细胞介素(IL)-6和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平。所有评估均在基线、3个月和6个月时进行。显著性水平设定为p<0.05。

结果

在随访3个月和6个月时,与基线相比,所有三组的PS(p<0.05)、BOP(p<0.05)和PD(p<0.05)均有显著改善。在基线时,所有三个研究组的所有临床和影像学种植体周围参数均未观察到显著差异。在随访3个月时,与基线相比,第1组患者的PS、BOP、PD和CBL有相当程度的改善。在随访6个月时,第1组和第2组在BOP、PD和CBL方面观察到类似差异。在基线时,所有三个研究组的PISF中IL-6和TNF-α水平均未观察到显著差异。在随访3个月和6个月时,与基线相比,第1组和第2组患者的TNF-α和IL-6水平分别有相当程度的降低。

结论

aPDT的应用在治疗T2DM患者种植体周围炎方面显示出改善的临床、影像学和免疫种植体周围参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验