Modification and comparison of CT criteria in the preoperative assessment of hepatic arterial invasion by hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of three CT criteria and two signs in evaluating hepatic arterial invasion by hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the CT images of 85 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Modified Loyer's, Lu's, and Li's standards were used to evaluate hepatic arterial invasion by hilar cholangiocarcinoma with the reference of intraoperative findings and/or the postoperative pathological diagnosis. Arterial tortuosity and contact length were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Loyer's, Lu's, and Li's standards showed sensitivities of 91.7%, 90.3%, and 72.2%, specificities of 94.0%, 94.5%, and 95.6%, and accuracies of 93.3%, 93.3%, and 89.0%, respectively, in evaluating hepatic arterial invasion by hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Loyer's and Lu's standards and contact length performed better than Li's standard (P < 0.001). Arterial tortuosity performed worse than other criteria (P < 0.001). The CT criteria performed best in evaluating proper hepatic arterial invasion compared with the left and right hepatic artery. When the cut-off contact length of 6.73 mm was combined with Loyer's standard, 4 false-negative cases could be avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

Loyer's and Lu's standards and the contact length performed best in evaluating hepatic arterial invasion by hilar cholangiocarcinoma on preoperative CT images, particularly in assessing the proper hepatic artery. Arterial tortuosity could serve as an important supplement. The combination of the contact length and Loyer's standard could improve the diagnostic performance.