Surgical Department, Gastroenterology Division, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;55:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) now increasingly target deep remission, yet the resultant more aggressive use of medical therapy is associated with potentially serious adverse events and significant costs. It is, therefore, of vital importance to consider when, how and in whom medical therapy may be safely de-escalated. This issue is of great potential relevance in the current SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. In this review, we first discuss the rationale for drug withdrawal in IBD, before considering the available data on withdrawal of 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA), immunomodulators (IM) and biological therapy in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). We consider how to identify patients most appropriate for drug withdrawal and outline a potential monitoring strategy for the early detection of relapse following drug withdrawal. We conclude with important future perspectives in this challenging field, and highlight ongoing trials that are likely to shape practice in the years to come.
炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗策略现在越来越多地针对深度缓解,但由此导致的更积极的药物治疗与潜在的严重不良事件和巨大的成本有关。因此,考虑何时、如何以及在哪些情况下可以安全地降低药物治疗强度至关重要。在当前的 SARS-CoV-2 大流行中,这一问题具有重要的潜在意义。在这篇综述中,我们首先讨论了在 IBD 中停药的基本原理,然后考虑了在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)中停用 5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)、免疫调节剂(IM)和生物治疗的现有数据。我们考虑如何确定最适合停药的患者,并概述了一种潜在的监测策略,用于在停药后早期发现复发。最后,我们在这一具有挑战性的领域中提出了重要的未来展望,并强调了正在进行的试验,这些试验可能会在未来几年塑造实践。