• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在加拿大铁杉林后的河岸林移除杜鹃属最大值不会降低阿巴拉契亚南部溪流的水质。

Removing riparian Rhododendron maximum in post-Tsuga canadensis riparian forests does not degrade water quality in southern Appalachian streams.

机构信息

Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Center for Forest Watershed Research, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3160 Coweeta Lab Rd, Otto, NC 28763, United States of America.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 20;761:143270. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143270. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143270
PMID:33160657
Abstract

In the past century, the evergreen woody shrub, Rhododendron maximum, has experienced habitat expansion following foundational tree species die-off in eastern US deciduous forests. Rhododendron can potentially alter stream chemistry, temperature, trophic dynamics, and in-stream decomposition rates, given its dominance in riparian areas. Here we conducted two operational-scale (3 ha) riparian treatments that removed rhododendron through cutting alone (CR, canopy removal), or removing both the rhododendron canopy and forest floor using cutting and prescribed fire (CFFR, canopy and forest floor removal). We expected that rhododendron shrub removal, with or without soil organic horizon removal, would increase soil nutrient availability and subsequently alter stream pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), inorganic nitrogen (NO-N, NH-N), total dissolved inorganic nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg). We hypothesized that responses would occur more quickly in the CFFR treatment. Treatments reduced shrub-, but not tree basal area. Treatments lowered soil N, but not C. Stream chemistry responses to treatments varied between CR and CFFR and were transient, generally with pH, N, and some cations declining, and aluminum (Al) and DOC showing a pulse increase. By removing rhododendron, the remaining deciduous trees likely accelerated N uptake as soil moisture availability increased. This could partially explain why we observed lower than expected stream nutrients (NO-N, Ca, and Mg) after treatments. Initial rhododendron slash on the forest floor coupled with incomplete consumption of the O-horizon on the CFFR treatment likely elevated DOC in the upper soil horizons and mobilized Al. From a management perspective, using these treatments to restore structure and function to riparian forests in the wake of eastern hemlock mortality, with or without fire, would most likely not result in short-term diminished water quality that is common when overstory trees are harvested and may even lower stream NO-N concentrations long term.

摘要

在过去的一个世纪里,常绿木本灌木杜鹃花属最大值在美国东部落叶林的主要树种死亡后,其栖息地不断扩大。由于杜鹃在河岸地区占主导地位,它有可能改变溪流的化学性质、温度、营养动态和溪流中的分解速率。在这里,我们进行了两项操作规模(3 公顷)的河岸处理,分别通过单独砍伐(CR,树冠移除)或使用砍伐和计划火烧(CFFR,树冠和林地移除)去除杜鹃。我们预计,无论是否去除土壤有机层,杜鹃灌木的移除都会增加土壤养分的有效性,随后改变溪流的 pH 值、酸中和能力(ANC)、无机氮(NO-N、NH-N)、总溶解无机氮、溶解有机碳(DOC)、钙(Ca)、钾(K)和镁(Mg)。我们假设 CFFR 处理中的反应会更快发生。处理降低了灌木的,但不是树木的基部面积。处理降低了土壤中的 N,但不是 C。溪流化学对处理的反应在 CR 和 CFFR 之间有所不同,且是短暂的,通常 pH 值、N 和一些阳离子下降,而铝(Al)和 DOC 显示出脉冲增加。通过去除杜鹃,剩余的落叶树可能会随着土壤水分可用性的增加而加速吸收 N。这可以部分解释为什么我们在处理后观察到低于预期的溪流养分(NO-N、Ca 和 Mg)。初始杜鹃林地上的采伐加上 CFFR 处理中 O 层不完全消耗,可能会导致上层土壤中 DOC 升高,并使 Al 移动。从管理的角度来看,在东部铁杉死亡后,使用这些处理方法来恢复河岸森林的结构和功能,无论是使用还是不使用火,都不太可能导致短期水质恶化,这种情况在采伐上层树木时很常见,甚至可能长期降低溪流中的 NO-N 浓度。

相似文献

1
Removing riparian Rhododendron maximum in post-Tsuga canadensis riparian forests does not degrade water quality in southern Appalachian streams.在加拿大铁杉林后的河岸林移除杜鹃属最大值不会降低阿巴拉契亚南部溪流的水质。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 20;761:143270. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143270. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Future species composition will affect forest water use after loss of eastern hemlock from southern Appalachian forests.未来的物种组成将影响南阿巴拉契亚森林失去东部铁杉后森林的用水量。
Ecol Appl. 2013 Jun;23(4):777-90. doi: 10.1890/12-0616.1.
3
Assessing the potential impacts to riparian ecosystems resulting from hemlock mortality in Great Smoky Mountains National Park.评估大烟山国家公园铁杉死亡对河岸生态系统造成的潜在影响。
Environ Manage. 2009 Aug;44(2):335-45. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9317-5. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
4
Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr. mortality will impact hydrologic processes in southern Appalachian forest ecosystems.加拿大铁杉(Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.)的死亡将影响阿巴拉契亚山脉南部森林生态系统的水文过程。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Jun;17(4):1156-67. doi: 10.1890/06-0027.
5
Long-term structural and biomass dynamics of virgin Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests after hurricane disturbance.飓风干扰后原始的加拿大铁杉-火炬松森林的长期结构和生物量动态。
Ecology. 2017 Mar;98(3):721-733. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1684. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Riparian forest composition affects stream litter decomposition despite similar microbial and invertebrate communities.河岸林组成影响溪流凋落物分解,尽管微生物和无脊椎动物群落相似。
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):151-9. doi: 10.1890/10-0028.1.
7
Canopy vegetation influences ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) communities in headwater stream riparian zones of central Appalachia.冠层植被影响阿巴拉契亚山脉中部源头溪流河岸带的蚂蚁(膜翅目:蚁科)群落。
J Insect Sci. 2014 Jan 1;14. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu099. Print 2014.
8
Invasion of temperate deciduous broadleaf forests by N-fixing tree species - consequences for stream ecosystems.固氮树种对温带落叶阔叶林的入侵——对溪流生态系统的影响
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Jun;96(3):877-902. doi: 10.1111/brv.12682. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
9
Mature and old-growth riparian forests: structure, dynamics, and effects on Adirondack stream habitats.成熟和老龄河岸森林:结构、动态及其对阿迪朗达克溪流栖息地的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Apr;17(3):852-68. doi: 10.1890/06-1172.
10
Importance of the vegetation-groundwater-stream continuum to understand transformation of biogenic carbon in aquatic systems - A case study based on a pine-maize comparison in a lowland sandy watershed (Landes de Gascogne, SW France).植被-地下水-水流连续体对于理解水生系统中生物成因碳转化的重要性——以法国西南部加斯科涅低地沙质流域中松-玉米对比为例的研究
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 15;661:613-629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.152. Epub 2019 Jan 16.