Center of Excellence for Psychosocial and Systemic Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;15(5):1362-1368. doi: 10.1111/eip.13066. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
Family interventions are a core component of first-episode psychosis (FEP) treatment; however, low implementation rates are consistently reported. As such, work is needed to understand the factors impacting real-world treatment delivery. The present paper describes the implementation of the McFarlane-model multifamily psychoeducational groups (MFG) in established FEP early intervention programs within a single state. The aims were to examine (a) training participation and implementation of MFG, (b) barriers and facilitators to implementation, and (c) modifications made to MFG.
Practitioners from six established FEP early intervention programs received in-person training and ongoing consultation in MFG. Training participation data were obtained via attendance and implementation outcomes were obtained from practitioner reports. Fifteen months following the initial training, practitioners reported on clinic-specific barriers, facilitators, and modifications across four categories (context, intervention, practitioner, and recipient).
Twenty-three practitioners across six clinics received in-person training and were offered ongoing consultation to support implementation. Difficulties in starting MFG were salient as the earliest group was run 7 months after the initial training, thereby resulting in low overall frequency of groups. A number of barriers spanning context, intervention, practitioner, and recipient domains were noted, the majority of which were clinic-specific. Despite challenges, practitioners identified several facilitators and made modifications to the intervention and its delivery in service of implementation.
Results from this implementation case study highlighted the challenges of delivering MFG in real-world FEP early intervention programs. Further, this paper emphasizes the value in identifying and addressing clinic-specific factors when implementing MFG.
家庭干预是首发精神病(FEP)治疗的核心组成部分;然而,实施率一直很低。因此,需要开展相关工作以了解影响现实世界治疗实施的因素。本文描述了在一个州内,既定的 FEP 早期干预项目中,麦克法兰模式多家庭心理教育小组(MFG)的实施情况。目的是:(a)检验 MFG 的培训参与和实施情况;(b)实施的障碍和促进因素;(c)对 MFG 的修改。
来自六个既定的 FEP 早期干预项目的从业者接受了 MFG 的现场培训和持续咨询。培训参与数据通过出勤获得,实施结果则通过从业者报告获得。在初始培训后的 15 个月,从业者报告了四个类别(背景、干预、从业者和接受者)中特定诊所的障碍、促进因素和修改。
六个诊所中的 23 名从业者接受了现场培训,并获得了实施支持的持续咨询。MFG 的启动困难突出,因为最早的小组是在初始培训后 7 个月开始的,因此小组的整体频率较低。注意到了许多跨越背景、干预、从业者和接受者领域的障碍,其中大多数是诊所特有的。尽管存在挑战,但从业者还是确定了一些促进因素,并对干预及其交付进行了修改,以服务于实施。
这项实施案例研究的结果强调了在现实世界的 FEP 早期干预项目中实施 MFG 的挑战。此外,本文强调了在实施 MFG 时识别和解决特定诊所因素的重要性。