Suppr超能文献

骨科虚拟骨折门诊 - 现有证据的系统评价。

Virtual Fracture Clinics in Orthopaedic Surgery - A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.

机构信息

University Hospital Waterford, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

University Hospital Waterford, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Injury. 2020 Dec;51(12):2757-2762. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Abstract

AIMS

Approximately 75% of fractures are simple, stable injuries which are often unnecessarily immobilised with subsequent repeated radiographs at numerous fracture clinic visits. In 2014, the Glasgow Fracture Pathway offered an alternative virtual fracture clinic (VFC) pathway with the potential to reduce traditional fracture clinic visits, waiting times and overall costs. Many units have implemented this style of pathway in the non-operative management of simple, undisplaced fractures. This study aims to systematically review the clinical outcomes, patient reported outcomes and cost analyses for VFCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on PRISMA guidelines, utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE Library databases. Studies reporting outcomes following the use of VFC were included. Outcomes analysed were: 1) clinical outcomes, 2) patient reported outcomes, and 3) cost analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies involving 11,921 patients with a mean age of 41.1 years and mean follow-up of 12.6 months were included. In total, 65.7% of patients were directly virtually discharged with protocol derived conservative management, with 9.1% using the Helpline and 15.6% contacting their general practitioner for advice or reassurance. A total of 1.2% of patients experienced fracture non-unions and 0.4% required surgical intervention. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 81.0%, with only 1.3% experiencing residual pain at the fracture site. Additionally, the mean cost per patient for VFC was £71, with a mean saving of £53 when compared to traditional clinic models. Subgroup analysis found that for undisplaced fifth metatarsal or radial head/neck fractures, the rates of discharge from VFC to physiotherapy or general practitioners were 81.2% and 93.7% respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study established that there is excellent evidence to support virtual fracture clinic for non-operative management of fifth metatarsal fractures, with moderate evidence for radial head and neck fractures. However, the routine use of virtual fracture clinics is presently not validated for all stable, undisplaced fracture patterns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic Review of all Levels of Evidence.

摘要

目的

大约 75%的骨折是简单、稳定的损伤,通常不需要进行不必要的固定,随后在多次骨折门诊就诊时进行多次重复的 X 光检查。2014 年,格拉斯哥骨折路径提供了一种替代的虚拟骨折门诊(VFC)途径,有可能减少传统的骨折门诊就诊次数、等待时间和总体成本。许多单位在简单、无移位骨折的非手术管理中采用了这种途径。本研究旨在系统地回顾 VFC 的临床结果、患者报告的结果和成本分析。

材料和方法

两名独立的审查员根据 PRISMA 指南进行文献检索,利用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。纳入了报告使用 VFC 后结果的研究。分析的结果包括:1)临床结果,2)患者报告的结果,和 3)成本分析。

结果

总体而言,纳入了 15 项研究,涉及 11921 名平均年龄为 41.1 岁、平均随访时间为 12.6 个月的患者。共有 65.7%的患者直接通过虚拟方式接受了基于方案的保守治疗,9.1%使用了热线,15.6%联系了他们的全科医生寻求建议或安心。共有 1.2%的患者发生骨折不愈合,0.4%需要手术干预。患者总体满意度为 81.0%,只有 1.3%的患者在骨折部位仍有残留疼痛。此外,VFC 每位患者的平均成本为 71 英镑,与传统门诊模式相比,平均节省 53 英镑。亚组分析发现,对于无移位的第五跖骨或桡骨头/颈骨折,从 VFC 出院到物理治疗或全科医生的比例分别为 81.2%和 93.7%。

讨论和结论

本研究证实,对于第五跖骨骨折的非手术治疗,VFC 有极好的证据支持,对于桡骨头和颈骨折则有中等证据支持。然而,目前尚未验证 VFC 对所有稳定、无移位的骨折模式的常规使用。

证据水平

IV;所有证据水平的系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验