Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行对直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的门球时间的影响 - 来自新加坡西部 STEMI 网络的结果。

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Door-to-Balloon Time for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Results From the Singapore Western STEMI Network.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Health System.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore.

出版信息

Circ J. 2021 Jan 25;85(2):139-149. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0800. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the outbreak response measures on door-to-balloon time (D2B). This study examined both D2B and clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective study of 303 STEMI patients who presented directly or were transferred to a tertiary hospital in Singapore for PPCI from October 2019 to March 2020. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients admitted before (BOR) and during (DOR) the COVID-19 outbreak response. The study outcomes were in-hospital death, D2B, cardiogenic shock and 30-day readmission. For direct presentations, fewer patients in the DOR group achieved D2B time <90 min compared with the BOR group (71.4% vs. 80.9%, P=0.042). This was more apparent after exclusion of non-system delay cases (DOR 81.6% vs. BOR 95.9%, P=0.006). Prevalence of both out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (9.5% vs. 1.9%, P=0.003) and acute mitral regurgitation (31.6% vs. 17.5%, P=0.006) was higher in the DOR group. Mortality was similar between groups. Multivariable regression showed that longer D2B time was an independent predictor of death (odds ratio 1.005, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1.011, P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic and the outbreak response have had an adverse effect on PPCI service efficiency. The study reinforces the need to focus efforts on shortening D2B time, while maintaining infection control measures.

摘要

背景

关于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和疫情应对措施对门球时间(D2B)的影响知之甚少。本研究检查了直接或转至新加坡一家三级医院行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的 STEMI 患者的 D2B 和临床结局。

方法和结果

这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 3 月期间 303 例 STEMI 患者,他们直接就诊或因 COVID-19 疫情应对措施而转至新加坡一家三级医院行 PPCI。我们比较了疫情应对期间(DOR)和疫情应对前(BOR)入院患者的临床结局。主要研究结局为院内死亡、D2B、心源性休克和 30 天再入院。对于直接就诊患者,DOR 组 D2B 时间<90min 的患者比例明显低于 BOR 组(71.4%比 80.9%,P=0.042)。排除非系统延迟病例后,差异更明显(DOR 组 81.6%比 BOR 组 95.9%,P=0.006)。DOR 组院外心脏骤停(9.5%比 1.9%,P=0.003)和急性二尖瓣反流(31.6%比 17.5%,P=0.006)的发生率更高。两组死亡率相似。多变量回归显示,D2B 时间较长是死亡的独立预测因素(比值比 1.005,95%置信区间 1.000-1.011,P=0.029)。

结论

COVID-19 大流行和疫情应对措施对 PPCI 服务效率产生了不利影响。本研究再次强调需要努力缩短 D2B 时间,同时保持感染控制措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验