随机对照 II 期研究:局部晚期胰腺癌放化疗联合与不联合诱导化疗的比较:日本临床肿瘤学组研究,JCOG1106。

Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka.

Department of Oncology Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 8;51(2):235-243. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa198.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. The aim of this randomized, multicentre phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy to determine the significance of induction chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm A) or induction chemotherapy followed by the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm B). Patients in Arm A underwent radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. Patients in Arm B received induction gemcitabine for 12 weeks, and thereafter, only patients with controlled disease underwent the same chemoradiotherapy as Arm A. After chemoradiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

Amongst 102 patients enrolled, 100 were eligible for efficacy assessment. The probability of survival was greater in Arm B in the first 12 months, but the trend was reversed in the following periods (1-year survival 66.7 vs. 69.3%, 2-year survival 36.9 vs. 18.9%). The hazard ratio was 1.255 (95% confidence interval 0.816-1.930) in favour of Arm A. Gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly more frequent and three treatment-related deaths occurred in Arm A.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that the chemoradiotherapy using S-1 alone had more promising efficacy with longer-term survival, compared with induction gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000006811.

摘要

背景

放化疗是局部晚期胰腺癌的一种治疗选择。然而,放化疗前诱导化疗的疗效尚不确定。本随机、多中心二期研究旨在评估放化疗联合和不联合诱导化疗的疗效和安全性,以确定诱导化疗的意义。

方法

局部晚期胰腺癌患者被随机分配至放化疗组(A 组)或诱导化疗后放化疗组(B 组)。A 组患者接受同步 S-1 放疗。B 组患者接受 12 周吉西他滨诱导化疗,此后仅疾病得到控制的患者接受与 A 组相同的放化疗。放化疗后,在两组中,均继续使用吉西他滨直至疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。主要终点是总生存期。

结果

在纳入的 102 例患者中,有 100 例符合疗效评估条件。B 组在前 12 个月的生存率更高,但在随后的时间段内趋势逆转(1 年生存率 66.7%比 69.3%,2 年生存率 36.9%比 18.9%)。A 组的风险比为 1.255(95%置信区间 0.816-1.930)。A 组胃肠道毒性略高,有 3 例治疗相关死亡。

结论

与局部晚期胰腺癌患者接受吉西他滨诱导化疗后再接受放化疗相比,单用 S-1 的放化疗具有更有前途的疗效,可带来更长期的生存。

临床试验注册

该研究在 UMIN 临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 UMIN000006811。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索