• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性非癌性疼痛人群中阿片类镇痛药使用的流行率:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Prevalence of Opioid Analgesic Use in People with Chronic Noncancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2021 Feb 23;22(2):506-517. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa322.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaa322
PMID:33164087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review studies examining the proportion of people with chronic noncancer pain who report consuming opioids and characteristics associated with their use.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We searched databases from inception to February 8, 2020, and conducted citation tracking. We included observational studies reporting the proportion of adults with chronic noncancer pain who used opioid analgesics. Opioids were categorized as weak (e.g., codeine) or strong (e.g., oxycodone). Study risk of bias was assessed, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations provided a summary of the overall quality. Results were pooled using a random-effects model. Meta-regression determined factors associated with opioid use.

RESULTS

Sixty studies (N=3,961,739) reported data on opioid use in people with chronic noncancer pain from 1990 to 2017. Of these 46, 77% had moderate risk of bias. Opioid use was reported by 26.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.1-30.8; moderate-quality evidence) of people with chronic noncancer pain. The use of weak opioids (17.3%; 95% CI 11.9-24.4; moderate-quality evidence) was more common than the use of strong opioids (9.8%; 95% CI, 6.8-14.0; low-quality evidence). Meta-regression determined that opioid use was associated with geographic region (P=0.02; lower in Europe than North America), but not sampling year (P=0.77), setting (P=0.06), diagnosis (P=0.34), or disclosure of funding (P=0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review summarized data from over 3.9 million people with chronic noncancer pain reporting their opioid use. Between 1990 and 2017, one-quarter of people with chronic noncancer pain reported taking opioids, and this proportion did not change over time.

摘要

目的

综述研究慢性非癌症疼痛患者报告使用阿片类药物的比例以及与使用相关的特征。

设计

系统评价。

方法

我们从成立到 2020 年 2 月 8 日搜索数据库,并进行了引文追踪。我们纳入了报告慢性非癌症疼痛成人使用阿片类镇痛药比例的观察性研究。阿片类药物分为弱阿片类药物(如可待因)和强阿片类药物(如羟考酮)。评估了研究的偏倚风险,并采用推荐评估、制定与评估分级(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations)对整体质量进行了总结。使用随机效应模型汇总结果。元回归确定了与阿片类药物使用相关的因素。

结果

1990 年至 2017 年间,60 项研究(N=3961739 人)报告了慢性非癌症疼痛患者使用阿片类药物的数据。其中 46 项研究的偏倚风险为 77%。26.8%(95%置信区间[CI],23.1-30.8;中等质量证据)的慢性非癌症疼痛患者报告使用阿片类药物。弱阿片类药物(17.3%;95%CI 11.9-24.4;中等质量证据)的使用比强阿片类药物(9.8%;95%CI 6.8-14.0;低质量证据)更为常见。元回归确定阿片类药物的使用与地理位置有关(P=0.02;欧洲低于北美),但与采样年份(P=0.77)、环境(P=0.06)、诊断(P=0.34)或资金披露(P=0.77)无关。

结论

我们的综述总结了来自超过 390 万例慢性非癌症疼痛患者报告其阿片类药物使用情况的数据。1990 年至 2017 年间,四分之一的慢性非癌症疼痛患者报告使用阿片类药物,且这一比例并未随时间而变化。

相似文献

1
The Prevalence of Opioid Analgesic Use in People with Chronic Noncancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.慢性非癌性疼痛人群中阿片类镇痛药使用的流行率:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 23;22(2):506-517. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa322.
2
What proportion of patients with chronic noncancer pain are prescribed an opioid medicine? Systematic review and meta-regression of observational studies.有多少慢性非癌痛患者被开具了阿片类药物处方?观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Intern Med. 2020 May;287(5):458-474. doi: 10.1111/joim.13026. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Prevalence of Problematic Use of Opioids in Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.慢性非癌痛患者中阿片类药物滥用的流行情况:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pain Pract. 2021 Jul;21(6):715-729. doi: 10.1111/papr.13001. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.慢性非癌痛阿片类药物治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2448-2460. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18472.
5
Pain in people seeking and receiving opioid agonist treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates.寻求并接受阿片类激动剂治疗的人群中的疼痛:患病率和相关因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2024 Nov;119(11):1879-1901. doi: 10.1111/add.16574. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Canadian guideline for safe and effective use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain: clinical summary for family physicians. Part 1: general population.加拿大慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物安全有效使用指南:家庭医生临床概要。第 1 部分:普通人群。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Nov;57(11):1257-66, e407-18.
7
8
[Opioids in chronic noncancer pain-are opioids different? A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized head-to-head comparisons of opioids of at least four week's duration].[慢性非癌性疼痛中的阿片类药物——阿片类药物有区别吗?对至少为期四周的阿片类药物随机直接比较中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行的系统评价与荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1432-4.
9
Interventions to Influence Opioid Prescribing Practices for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.干预措施对影响阿片类药物处方治疗慢性非癌痛的实践:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):e15-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
European* clinical practice recommendations on opioids for chronic noncancer pain - Part 1: Role of opioids in the management of chronic noncancer pain.欧洲慢性非癌痛阿片类药物临床实践推荐 - 第 1 部分:阿片类药物在慢性非癌痛管理中的作用。
Eur J Pain. 2021 May;25(5):949-968. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1736. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Opioid deprescribing: rethinking policies to facilitate better patient outcomes.阿片类药物减药:重新思考政策以促进更好的患者预后。
Pain Manag. 2025 Jul;15(7):413-423. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2516409. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Platelet-Rich Plasma for Treating Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.富血小板血浆治疗慢性非癌性疼痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pain Ther. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00751-5.
3
Understanding the first prescription: clinical and demographic drivers of strong opioid use in primary care.
解读首份处方:基层医疗中强效阿片类药物使用的临床及人口统计学驱动因素
Pain Med. 2025 Sep 1;26(9):583-590. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf053.
4
Two-Phase Inpatient Withdrawal Programme for Long-Term Opioid Use in Non-Cancer Pain.用于非癌性疼痛长期阿片类药物使用的两阶段住院戒毒计划。
Eur J Pain. 2025 May;29(5):e70010. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70010.
5
Predictors of persistent opioid use in Australian primary care: A retrospective cohort study, 2018-2022.澳大利亚初级医疗中持续使用阿片类药物的预测因素:一项2018 - 2022年的回顾性队列研究
Pain Med. 2024 Aug 6;25(12):748-57. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae071.
6
Paracetamol Combination Therapy for Back Pain and Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.对背痛和骨关节炎的扑热息痛联合治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2024 Aug;84(8):953-967. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02065-w. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Prevalence of opioid use in adults with spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.脊髓损伤成人中阿片类药物使用的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Mar;48(2):170-188. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2319384. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
8
The holistic effects of medical cannabis compared to opioids on pain experience in Finnish patients with chronic pain.与阿片类药物相比,医用大麻对芬兰慢性疼痛患者疼痛体验的整体影响。
J Cannabis Res. 2023 Nov 9;5(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s42238-023-00207-7.
9
Predictors of fatal and nonfatal overdose after prescription of opioids for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.预测慢性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物后致死和非致死性药物过量的因素:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2023 Oct 23;195(41):E1399-E1411. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230459.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Naloxegol in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Who Experience Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Pooled Analysis of Two Global, Randomized Controlled Studies.纳洛西醇用于治疗阿片类药物引起便秘的慢性非癌性疼痛患者的疗效与安全性:两项全球随机对照研究的汇总分析
J Pain Res. 2023 Aug 28;16:2943-2953. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S417045. eCollection 2023.