• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经自然腔道标本取出术在乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤切除术中的回顾性研究。

Retrospective Study of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Resection of Sigmoid and Rectal Tumors.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Nov;31(11):1227-1231. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0780. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2020.0780
PMID:33164666
Abstract

With the development of surgical technology, surgeons are paying more and more attention to minimally invasive procedures such as injury reduction, pain reduction, and beautiful incisions to ensure the effectiveness of surgical treatment. This article discusses the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon and rectal tumors via natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES). The clinical data of 39 patients who underwent complete laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon tumor or rectal tumor at Chengde Medical College Hospital between 2018 and 2020, including general patient data (gender, age, body mass index [BMI], etc.), surgery-related data, general postoperative conditions, and postoperative pathological data, were retrospectively analyzed to explore the feasibility and safety of NOSES. The specimens were all removed through the anorectal resection drag out type. The average age of 39 patients was 61.3 ± 10.2 years, the average BMI was 24.0 ± 3.1 kg/m, the average postoperative hospital stay was 11.2 ± 4.4 days, 12 patients with sigmoid colon tumors, including 11 malignant tumors and 1 schwannoma, 27 rectal tumors, including 1 rectal villous tubular adenoma, among the 37 patients with malignant tumors, ulcer type 32 cases of adenocarcinoma and 5 cases of mass adenocarcinoma, mean number of lymph nodes detected intraoperatively (11.9 ± 3.9), mean operative time (162.9 ± 43.0 minutes), mean operative bleeding (36.9 ± 13.0 mL), mean time of initial exhaust (4.3 ± 3.0) days, mean time of laparoscopic drainage tube removal (9.8 ± 1.4) days, mean time of postoperative feeding (4.4 ± 3.0) days, the average maximum tumor diameter (3.7 ± 1.4 cm), and the average distance of the tumor from the anal margin (14.1 ± 6.1 cm); after surgery, there were two cases of anastomotic fistula. Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon and rectal tumors via natural orifice specimen extraction has the advantages of less pain, reduced incisional complications, good safety, and accurate efficacy in clinical applications.

摘要

随着外科技术的发展,外科医生越来越关注微创程序,如减少损伤、减轻疼痛和美观的切口,以确保手术治疗的有效性。本文讨论了通过自然腔道标本提取手术(NOSES)进行腹腔镜乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤切除术的安全性、可行性和临床结果。回顾性分析了承德医学院附属医院 2018 年至 2020 年间完成的 39 例乙状结肠肿瘤或直肠肿瘤完全腹腔镜切除术患者的临床资料,包括一般患者资料(性别、年龄、体重指数[BMI]等)、手术相关数据、一般术后情况和术后病理资料,探讨了 NOSES 的可行性和安全性。标本均通过肛门直肠切除拖出式取出。39 例患者的平均年龄为 61.3±10.2 岁,平均 BMI 为 24.0±3.1kg/m,平均术后住院时间为 11.2±4.4 天,12 例乙状结肠肿瘤,包括 11 例恶性肿瘤和 1 例神经鞘瘤,27 例直肠肿瘤,包括 1 例直肠绒毛管状腺瘤,37 例恶性肿瘤患者中,溃疡型 32 例腺癌和 5 例肿块型腺癌,术中检测的平均淋巴结数(11.9±3.9)个,平均手术时间(162.9±43.0)分钟,平均手术出血量(36.9±13.0)mL,初次排气时间(4.3±3.0)天,腹腔镜引流管拔除时间(9.8±1.4)天,术后喂养时间(4.4±3.0)天,平均最大肿瘤直径(3.7±1.4cm),肿瘤距肛门边缘的平均距离(14.1±6.1cm);术后吻合口瘘 2 例。腹腔镜乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤经自然腔道标本提取术具有疼痛少、切口并发症减少、安全性好、疗效准确的优点,在临床应用中有一定优势。

相似文献

1
Retrospective Study of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Resection of Sigmoid and Rectal Tumors.经自然腔道标本取出术在乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤切除术中的回顾性研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Nov;31(11):1227-1231. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0780. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
[Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].[162例直肠肿瘤患者机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191017-00453.
3
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer.乙状结肠/高位直肠癌患者自然腔道标本取出术与传统腹腔镜手术的疗效及安全性比较
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1160-1166. doi: 10.1002/jso.27235. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
4
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors.腹腔镜前切除术经自然腔道标本取出术(NOSE-LAR)与经腹部切口标本取出术(AISE-LAR)治疗乙状结肠或直肠肿瘤的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 19;18(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01982-w.
5
[Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].腹腔镜辅助经自然腔道标本取出手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗左半结肠癌的比较:一项随访3年的随机对照研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 25;25(7):604-611. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220129-00040.
6
A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study.腹腔镜直肠前切除术治疗中上段直肠或下段乙状结肠癌的改良经肛标本取出技术:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01085-7.
7
Laparoscopy-Assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction to Treat Tumors of the Sigmoid Colon and Rectum: The Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of a Retrospective Study.腹腔镜辅助经自然腔道标本取出术治疗乙状结肠和直肠癌:一项回顾性研究的短期和长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jun;29(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0601. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
[Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].腹腔镜乙状结肠根治性切除术中经直肠标本取出与传统腹腔镜辅助手术短期结局的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;20(6):665-670.
9
[Protective measures in laparoscopic resection for upper or mid rectal cancer and sigmoid colon cancer with transrectal specimen extraction surgery].[经直肠标本取出手术的腹腔镜下中上段直肠癌及乙状结肠癌切除术的保护措施]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;20(10):1151-1155.
10
Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.对于选定的乙状结肠癌或直肠癌患者,完全腹腔镜切除术联合经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSE)与腹腔镜辅助切除术相比具有更多优势。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Sep;29(9):1119-24. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1950-7. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacteriological and oncological safety of complete laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer without incision anastomosis based on propensity-matched scores.基于倾向评分匹配的完全腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术无切口吻合的细菌学和肿瘤学安全性
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Mar;18(1):135-143. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.119238. Epub 2022 Sep 4.