Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Department of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2021 Mar 1;44(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000444.
Patient-relevant outcome measures for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) are needed. The motor function measure (MFM) is an ordinal-based outcome measure for neuromuscular disorders, but its suitability to measure FSHD patients is questionable. Here, we performed Rasch analyses on MFM data from 194 FSHD patients to assess clinimetric properties in this patient group. Both the total scale and its three domains were analyzed (D1: standing position and transfers; D2: axial and proximal motor function; D3: distal motor function). Fit to the Rasch model, sample-item targeting, individual item fit, threshold ordering, sex- and age-based differential item functioning, response dependency and unidimensionality were assessed. Rasch analysis revealed multiple limitations of the MFM for FSHD, the most important being a large ceiling effect and suboptimal sample-item targeting, which were most pronounced for domains D2 and D3. There were disordered thresholds for most items, often resulting in items functioning in a dichotomous fashion. It was not possible to remodel the MFM into a Rasch-built interval scale. Remodeling of domain D1 into an interval scale with adequate fit statistics was achieved, but sample-item targeting remained suboptimal. Therefore, the MFM should be used with caution in FSHD patients, as it is not optimally suited to measure functional abilities in this patient group.
需要用于面肩肱型肌营养不良症(FSHD)的患者相关结局测量指标。运动功能测量(MFM)是一种针对神经肌肉疾病的基于等级的结局测量指标,但它是否适合测量 FSHD 患者的情况尚存在疑问。在这里,我们对 194 例 FSHD 患者的 MFM 数据进行了 Rasch 分析,以评估该患者群体中的临床测量特性。对总量表及其三个域(D1:站立姿势和转移;D2:轴性和近端运动功能;D3:远端运动功能)进行了分析。评估了对 Rasch 模型的拟合、样本项目靶向、个体项目拟合、阈值排序、基于性别和年龄的差异项目功能、反应依赖性和单维性。Rasch 分析显示,MFM 用于 FSHD 存在多种局限性,最重要的是天花板效应较大且样本项目靶向不佳,这在 D2 和 D3 域中最为明显。大多数项目的阈值混乱,通常导致项目以二分法的方式运作。无法将 MFM 重塑为 Rasch 构建的区间量表。虽然可以通过将域 D1 重塑为具有适当拟合统计数据的区间量表来实现,但样本项目靶向仍然不佳。因此,在 FSHD 患者中应谨慎使用 MFM,因为它并不完全适合测量该患者群体的功能能力。