Kools Joost, Vincenten Sanne, van Engelen Baziel G M, Voet Nicoline B M, Merkies Ingemar, Horlings Corinne G C, Voermans Nicol C, Mul K
Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Klimmendaal, Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Jan;71(1):55-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.28293. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The number of clinical trials in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is expected to increase in the near future. There is a need for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that can capture disease progression over the relatively short time span of a clinical trial. In this study, we report the natural progression of FSHD and determine the feasibility of COAs for clinical trials.
Genetically confirmed FSHD patients underwent various COAs at baseline and after 5 years. COAs consisted of the Motor Function Measure (MFM), manual muscle testing using the Medical Research Council score, six-minute walk test, quantitative muscle strength assessment of the quadriceps muscle, clinical severity score, and FSHD evaluation score (FES). Statistical significance and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were calculated and power calculations were performed.
One hundred fifty-four symptomatic FSHD patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 51.4 (14.6) years old. All COAs showed a minimal, yet statistically significant progression after 5 years. MCID was reached for the MFM Domain 1, MFM total score, and FES. These three COAs showed the lowest sample size requirements for clinical trials (185, 156, and 201 participants per group, respectively, for a trial duration of 2 years).
The captured FSHD disease progression rate in 5 years was generally minimal. The COAs in this study are not feasible for clinical trials with a duration of 2 years. Extended trial durations or novel outcome assessments might be necessary to improve trial feasibility in FSHD.
引言/目的:预计在不久的将来,面肩肱型肌营养不良症(FSHD)的临床试验数量将会增加。需要能够在相对较短的临床试验时间跨度内捕捉疾病进展的临床结局评估(COA)。在本研究中,我们报告了FSHD的自然进展情况,并确定了COA用于临床试验的可行性。
基因确诊的FSHD患者在基线时和5年后接受了各种COA评估。COA包括运动功能测量(MFM)、使用医学研究委员会评分进行的徒手肌力测试、六分钟步行测试、股四头肌的定量肌力评估、临床严重程度评分和FSHD评估评分(FES)。计算了统计学显著性和最小临床重要差异(MCID),并进行了效能计算。
纳入了154例有症状的FSHD患者,平均(标准差)年龄为51.4(14.6)岁。所有COA在5年后均显示出最小但具有统计学显著性的进展。MFM第1领域、MFM总分和FES达到了MCID。这三种COA在临床试验中显示出最低的样本量要求(每组分别为185、156和201名参与者,试验持续时间为2年)。
5年内捕捉到的FSHD疾病进展率总体上最小。本研究中的COA对于持续时间为2年的临床试验不可行。可能需要延长试验持续时间或采用新的结局评估方法来提高FSHD临床试验的可行性。