• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村和城市养老院新入住老年居民的敏锐度差异。

Acuity Differences Among Newly Admitted Older Residents in Rural and Urban Nursing Homes.

机构信息

Maine Rural Health Research Center, University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine, US.

Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine, US.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):826-837. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa183.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaa183
PMID:33165529
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to assess rural-urban acuity differences among newly admitted older nursing home residents.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data included the 2015 Minimum Data Set v3.0, the Area Health Resources File, the Provider of Services File, and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Activities of daily living, the Cognitive Function Scale, and aggression/wandering indicators were used to assess functional, cognitive, and behavioral status, respectively. Excluding assessments for short stays (less than 90 days), assessments for 209,719 newly admitted long-stay residents aged 65 and older across 14,834 facilities in 47 states were evaluated. Difference in differences (DID) generalized linear models with state-fixed effects and clustering by facilities were used to assess the interaction effect of older age (75 plus) on rural-urban acuity differences, controlling for socioeconomic factors, admission source, and market characteristics.

RESULTS

Residents admitted to rural facilities were less functionally impaired (incidence rate ratio: 0.973-0.898) but had more cognitive (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03-1.22) and problem behaviors (OR: 1.19-1.48) than urban. Although older age was predictive of higher acuity, in DID models, the expected decline in functional status was comparable in rural and urban facilities, while the cognitive and behavioral status for older admissions was 8.0% and 8.5% lower in rural versus urban facilities, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Although the higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and problem behaviors among rural admissions was attributable in part to older age, rural facilities admitted less complex individuals among older age residents than urban facilities. Findings may reflect less capacity to manage older, complex individuals in rural facilities.

摘要

背景与目的

我们的主要目的是评估新入住的老年护理院居民的城乡医疗资源利用差异。

研究设计与方法

数据包括 2015 年最低数据集 v3.0、区域卫生资源文件、服务提供者文件和农村-城市通勤区代码。日常生活活动、认知功能量表和攻击/游荡指标分别用于评估功能、认知和行为状况。排除短期入住(少于 90 天)的评估后,对来自 47 个州的 14834 家机构的 209719 名 65 岁及以上的新入住长期居民进行了评估。使用具有州固定效应和按机构聚类的差异中的差异(DID)广义线性模型,控制社会经济因素、入院来源和市场特征,评估高龄(75 岁及以上)对城乡医疗资源利用差异的交互效应。

结果

入住农村机构的居民功能障碍程度较低(发病率比:0.973-0.898),但认知(优势比 [OR]:1.03-1.22)和问题行为(OR:1.19-1.48)更多。尽管高龄是医疗资源利用程度高的预测因素,但在 DID 模型中,农村和城市机构的功能状态预期下降程度相当,而农村机构的高龄患者认知和行为状况分别比城市机构低 8.0%和 8.5%。

讨论与意义

尽管农村入住患者认知障碍和行为问题的发生率较高部分归因于高龄,但农村机构对高龄居民的管理能力低于城市机构,入住的复杂性较低的个体较少。这些发现可能反映了农村机构在管理高龄、复杂患者方面的能力不足。

相似文献

1
Acuity Differences Among Newly Admitted Older Residents in Rural and Urban Nursing Homes.农村和城市养老院新入住老年居民的敏锐度差异。
Gerontologist. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):826-837. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa183.
2
Differences between newly admitted nursing home residents in rural and nonrural areas in a national sample.全国样本中农村和非农村地区新入住养老院居民之间的差异。
Gerontologist. 2006 Feb;46(1):33-41. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.1.33.
3
Nursing Home and Market Factors and Risk-Adjusted Hospitalization Rates Among Urban, Micropolitan, and Rural Nursing Homes.城市、大都市统计区和农村养老院的养老院和市场因素与风险调整后的住院率。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 May;22(5):1101-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Level of Need, Divertibility, and Outcomes of Newly Admitted Nursing Home Residents.新入院养老院居民的需求水平、可转移程度和结局。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):616-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
5
Rural-urban differences in medical care for nursing home residents with severe dementia at the end of life.临终时患有严重痴呆症的养老院居民医疗护理的城乡差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Aug;54(8):1199-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00824.x.
6
Relationship between Functional Improvement and Cognition in Short-Stay Nursing Home Residents.短期居住养老院居民的功能改善与认知之间的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Mar;67(3):553-557. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15708. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Variations in nursing home discharge rates for urban and rural nursing facility residents with hip fracture.城市和农村髋部骨折护理机构居民的疗养院出院率差异。
J Rural Health. 2003 Spring;19(2):148-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00556.x.
8
Functional disability at nursing home admission: a comparison of urban and rural admission cohorts.养老院入院时的功能残疾:城乡入院队列的比较。
J Rural Health. 2001 Summer;17(3):229-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2001.tb00960.x.
9
The impact of rural residence on multiple hospitalizations in nursing facility residents.农村居住环境对护理机构居民多次住院的影响。
Gerontologist. 2002 Oct;42(5):661-6. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.5.661.
10
Pre-Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Status, Subsequent Disability, and New Nursing Home Admission among Critically Ill Older Adults.重症老年患者 ICU 前认知状态、随后残疾和新入住护理院情况。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 May;15(5):622-629. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201709-702OC.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Literature Review of Rural Institutional Elder Care.农村机构养老的范围文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(16):10319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610319.