• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高保真模拟与基于视频的学习在小儿感染性休克管理中的比较:一项初步研究。

High-fidelity simulation versus video-based learning in the management of pediatric septic shock: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.

Department of Intensive Care, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;180(2):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03856-5. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00431-020-03856-5
PMID:33165685
Abstract

High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and video-based learning (VBL) promote competence in acute care in a realistic and safe environment. These two modalities have not been compared in pediatric emergency situations. Interns rotating in the pediatric department were randomized for the two educational methods. The delivered learning subject was septic shock in children. The level of knowledge was measured before intervention, immediately after intervention (post-test 1) and 1 week later (post-test 2). Knowledge test scores improved significantly following intervention in both VBL study group and HFS study group (71.5 ± 13.2 [39.0-88.0], p < 0.001 and 80.1 ± 10.3 [57.4-94.5], p < 0.001, respectively). The improvement was significantly higher in HFS study group (p = 0.04). There was a non-significant drop in the retention score evaluated by the post-test 2 in the two groups compared to the post-test 1 score (66.9 ± 15.4 [31.5-86.1], p = 0.17 and 78.8 ± 12.4 [56.0-100.0], p = 0.72 in the VBL and HFS study groups, respectively). The retention score was significantly higher in the HFS group (p = 0.04).Conclusion: High-fidelity simulation and video-based training are both effective educational methods in teaching pediatric emergencies for interns. HFS appears to be superior in enhancing short-term retention. What is Known: • High-fidelity simulation is an effective educational tool to improve learners' knowledge and skills. • Video-based learning is an effective teaching tool in terms of short-term knowledge acquisition. What is New: • High-fidelity simulation is more effective in terms of short-term knowledge and generated more satisfaction than educational video learning.

摘要

高保真模拟 (HFS) 和基于视频的学习 (VBL) 在真实安全的环境中促进急性护理能力。这两种模式在儿科急症中尚未进行比较。在儿科轮转的实习生被随机分配到两种教育方法中。所提供的学习主题是儿童脓毒性休克。在干预前、干预后立即(后测 1)和 1 周后(后测 2)测量知识水平。在 VBL 研究组和 HFS 研究组中,干预后知识测试得分均显著提高(71.5±13.2[39.0-88.0],p<0.001和 80.1±10.3[57.4-94.5],p<0.001)。HFS 研究组的改善明显更高(p=0.04)。与后测 1 相比,两组的保留得分在后测 2 中均略有下降(VBL 和 HFS 研究组的 66.9±15.4[31.5-86.1],p=0.17 和 78.8±12.4[56.0-100.0],p=0.72)。HFS 组的保留得分明显更高(p=0.04)。结论:高保真模拟和基于视频的培训都是实习生教授儿科急症的有效教育方法。HFS 在增强短期保留方面似乎更有效。已知:•高保真模拟是提高学习者知识和技能的有效教育工具。•基于视频的学习是一种有效的教学工具,可在短期内获取知识。新内容:•高保真模拟在短期知识方面更有效,并且比教育视频学习产生更高的满意度。

相似文献

1
High-fidelity simulation versus video-based learning in the management of pediatric septic shock: a pilot study.高保真模拟与基于视频的学习在小儿感染性休克管理中的比较:一项初步研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;180(2):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03856-5. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Comparison of simulation and video-based training for acute asthma.模拟与基于视频的急性哮喘培训比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04836-7.
3
A randomised controlled trial study on the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation in enhancing skills among undergraduate medical students.一项关于高保真模拟在提高本科生医学生技能方面的有效性的随机对照试验研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2024 Jul;79(4):421-428.
4
Effectiveness of high fidelity simulation versus low fidelity simulation on practical/clinical skill development in pre-registration physiotherapy students: a systematic review.高保真模拟与低保真模拟对预注册物理治疗专业学生实践/临床技能发展的有效性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Jun;17(6):1229-1255. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003931.
5
Learning to Beat the Shock Clock: A Low-Fidelity Simulation Board Game for Pediatric and Emergency Medicine Residents.学会战胜休克时钟:一款面向儿科和急诊医学住院医师的低保真模拟棋盘游戏。
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Feb 11;15:10804. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10804.
6
High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for training undergraduate medical students in pediatric emergencies: a quasi-experimental study.高保真模拟与基于案例的讨论在儿科急症培训本科生中的比较:一项准实验研究。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2024 Jul-Aug;100(4):422-429. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
7
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation methods to gain Foley catheterization knowledge, skills, satisfaction and self-confidence among novice nursing students: A randomized controlled trial.高保真模拟方法在新手护生中获取导尿知识、技能、满意度和自信心方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Nov;130:105952. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105952. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
The effect of simulator fidelity on acquiring non-technical skills: a randomized non-inferiority trial.模拟器逼真度对非技术技能习得的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Dec;64(12):1182-1193. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0973-2. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
Hybrid simulation of pediatric gynecologic examination: a mix-methods study of learners' attitudes and factors affecting learning.儿科妇科检查的混合模拟:学习者态度及影响学习因素的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 24;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02076-7.
10
Video-Based Learning vs Traditional Lecture for Instructing Emergency Medicine Residents in Disaster Medicine Principles of Mass Triage, Decontamination, and Personal Protective Equipment.基于视频的学习与传统讲座在指导急诊医学住院医师掌握灾难医学中的大规模分诊、去污和个人防护装备原则方面的比较
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):7-12. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1700718X. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for training undergraduate medical students in pediatric emergencies: a quasi-experimental study.高保真模拟与基于案例的讨论在儿科急症培训本科生中的比较:一项准实验研究。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2024 Jul-Aug;100(4):422-429. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-efficacy in pediatric resuscitation: implications for education and performance.
Pediatrics. 1996 Jan;97(1):94-9.