• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于日本女性,使用数字乳腺断层合成技术与单纯使用数字乳腺钼靶进行乳腺癌筛查的比较。

Breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography alone for Japanese women.

作者信息

Ban Kanako, Tsunoda Hiroko, Togashi Seiko, Kawaguchi Yuko, Sato Takanobu, Takahashi Yoko, Nagatsuka Yoshitaka

机构信息

Tokyo Health Service Association, 1-2, Ichigaya-sadohara-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8402, Japan.

St Luke's International Hospital, 9-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2021 Mar;28(2):459-464. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01180-2. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-020-01180-2
PMID:33165757
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to confirm the position of DBT in breast cancer screening in Japan, to assess cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value (PPV), and to evaluate the type of mammographic findings of cancer with the use of digital mammography alone (2DDM) and combined with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).

METHODS

11,894 examinations of the opportunistic breast cancer screening using only 2DDM and 2DDM plus DBT were performed from May 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019. The 11,894 women [3535 women who received DBT in addition to 2DDM (3D group) and 8359 who received 2DDM only (2D group)] participated in this study. The study was approved by the Institute's Ethics Committee and all participants provided written informed consent.

RESULTS

The recall rate was 2.6% for the 3D group and 3.6% for the 2D group (p < 0.01). The cancer detection rate was 0.17% in both 3D and 2D groups (p = 0.978). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 6.5% for the 3D group and 4.7% for the 2D group (p = 0.484). The cause of the decrease in recall rate was due to a decrease in the finding of focal asymmetric density (FAD).

CONCLUSION

The recall rate was improved by using DBT for breast cancer screening in Japanese women. Cancer detection rates were exactly the same in DBT and 2DDM groups, so only DBT non-inferiority could be verified. We have verified that breast cancer screening combined with DBT is useful even for Japanese women to reduce unnecessary further examination.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)在日本乳腺癌筛查中的地位,评估癌症检出率、召回率、阳性预测值(PPV),并使用单纯数字乳腺摄影(2DDM)以及联合数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)来评估乳腺癌的乳腺摄影表现类型。

方法

2017年5月1日至2019年3月31日期间,共进行了11,894例机会性乳腺癌筛查检查,其中仅使用2DDM以及2DDM联合DBT。11,894名女性[3535名除2DDM外还接受DBT的女性(3D组)和8359名仅接受2DDM的女性(2D组)]参与了本研究。该研究获得了研究所伦理委员会的批准,所有参与者均提供了书面知情同意书。

结果

3D组的召回率为2.6%,2D组为3.6%(p<0.01)。3D组和2D组的癌症检出率均为0.17%(p = 0.978)。3D组的阳性预测值(PPV)为6.5%,2D组为4.7%(p = 0.484)。召回率下降的原因是局灶性不对称密度(FAD)的发现减少。

结论

在日本女性乳腺癌筛查中使用DBT可提高召回率。DBT组和2DDM组的癌症检出率完全相同,因此仅能证实DBT的非劣效性。我们已经证实,联合DBT的乳腺癌筛查对于日本女性减少不必要的进一步检查也是有用的。

相似文献

1
Breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography alone for Japanese women.对于日本女性,使用数字乳腺断层合成技术与单纯使用数字乳腺钼靶进行乳腺癌筛查的比较。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Mar;28(2):459-464. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01180-2. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Comparative study of the usefulness of adjunctive tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening by mammography and ultrasound in Japan.日本 X 线立体定向活检与超声辅助乳腺癌筛查的对比研究。
Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep;29(5):790-795. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01358-w. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.数字乳腺 X 线摄影与数字乳腺 X 线摄影加断层合成技术用于乳腺癌筛查的比较:雷焦艾米利亚断层合成随机试验。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):375-385. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172119. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影在社区实践中对患者年龄、筛查轮次和乳腺密度的筛查性能比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11792.
5
Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.数字乳腺断层合成摄影术与数字乳腺 X 线摄影术对年龄和乳腺密度相关的癌症检出率和召回率的比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 1;5(5):635-642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7078.
6
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.数字乳腺断层合成二维图像与全视野数字化乳腺摄影用于人群筛查的比较:来自维罗纳筛查项目的结果。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):37-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170745. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.连续 5 年使用数字乳腺断层合成技术进行筛查:按筛查年度和轮次的结果。
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):285-293. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191751. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
8
Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.多中心研究:数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影联合用于乳腺癌筛查的评估。
Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):545-553. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200240. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
9
Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.社区实践中,与二维数字乳腺钼靶相比,3D 数字乳腺断层合成在乳腺癌筛查中的临床性能指标。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):687-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12642. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening in Asian Countries: Epidemiology, Screening Practices, Outcomes, Challenges, and Future Directions.亚洲国家的乳腺癌筛查:流行病学、筛查实践、结果、挑战及未来方向
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Aug;26(8):743-758. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2025.0338.
2
Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in combination with mammography for screening early-stage breast cancer.动态对比增强磁共振成像结合乳腺 X 线摄影在早期乳腺癌筛查中的价值。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Jun;23(2):290-297. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i2.33.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.数字乳腺 X 线摄影与数字乳腺 X 线摄影加断层合成技术用于乳腺癌筛查的比较:雷焦艾米利亚断层合成随机试验。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):375-385. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172119. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.数字乳腺断层合成二维图像与全视野数字化乳腺摄影用于人群筛查的比较:来自维罗纳筛查项目的结果。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):37-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170745. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.
数字乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的放射剂量比较:单视图分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5024-4. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.合成二维乳房 X 光摄影术与断层合成技术在大型筛查人群中的临床性能。
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):70-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162674. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.数字乳腺断层合成摄影术与数字乳腺钼靶摄影联合用于乳腺癌筛查。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6095.
6
Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.两视图数字乳腺断层合成投影图像筛查:与全视野数字乳腺断层合成图像筛查的比较。
Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):655-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131391. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.三维数字乳腺 X 线摄影与断层合成技术在人群乳腺癌筛查中的整合(STORM):一项前瞻性对比研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
8
Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.临床数字乳腺断层摄影系统:剂量学特征。
Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):35-42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111789. Epub 2012 Feb 13.