International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India.
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Feb;26(2):146-158. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13523. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
To estimate population need and coverage for distance glasses, hearing aids and wheelchairs in India and Cameroon, and to explore the relationship between assistive product (AP) need measured through self-report and clinical impairment assessment.
Population-based surveys of approximately 4000 people each were conducted in Mahabubnagar district, India and Fundong district, Cameroon. Participants underwent standardised vision, hearing and musculoskeletal impairment assessment to assess need for distance glasses, hearing aids, wheelchairs. Participants with moderate or worse impairment and/or self-reported difficulties in functioning were also asked about their self-reported AP need.
6.5% (95% CI 5.4-7.9) in India and 1.9% (95% CI 1.5-2.4) in Cameroon of the population needed at least one of the three APs based on moderate or worse impairments. Total need was highest for distance glasses [3.7% (95% CI 2.8-4.7) India; 0.8% (95% CI 0.5-1.1), Cameroon] and lowest for wheelchairs (0.1% both settings; 95% CI 0.03-0.3 India, 95% CI 0.04-0.3 Cameroon). Coverage for each AP was below 40%, except for distance glasses in India, where it was 87% (95% CI 77.1-93.0). The agreement between self-report and clinical impairment assessment of AP need was poor. For instance, in India, 60% of people identified through clinical assessment as needing distance glasses did not self-report a need. Conversely, in India, 75% of people who self-reported needing distance glasses did not require one based on clinical impairment assessment.
There is high need and low coverage of three APs in two low-and middle-income settings. Methodological shortcomings highlight the need for improved survey methods compatible with the international classification of functioning, disability and health to estimate population-level need for AP and related services to inform advocacy and planning.
估计印度和喀麦隆的远距离眼镜、助听器和轮椅的人口需求和覆盖范围,并探讨通过自我报告和临床损伤评估测量的辅助器具(AP)需求之间的关系。
在印度马哈德布纳加尔区和喀麦隆丰顿区进行了大约 4000 人的基于人群的调查。参与者接受了标准化的视力、听力和肌肉骨骼损伤评估,以评估远距离眼镜、助听器、轮椅的需求。有中度或更严重损伤和/或自我报告功能障碍困难的参与者也被问及他们自我报告的 AP 需求。
根据中度或更严重损伤,印度有 6.5%(95%CI 5.4-7.9)和喀麦隆有 1.9%(95%CI 1.5-2.4)的人口需要至少一种 AP。基于三种 AP 的总需求最高的是远距离眼镜[3.7%(95%CI 2.8-4.7)印度;0.8%(95%CI 0.5-1.1),喀麦隆],最低的是轮椅(两个地区均为 0.1%;95%CI 0.03-0.3 印度,95%CI 0.04-0.3 喀麦隆)。除了印度的距离眼镜覆盖范围达到 87%(95%CI 77.1-93.0)外,每个 AP 的覆盖率均低于 40%。自我报告和临床损伤评估 AP 需求之间的一致性很差。例如,在印度,通过临床评估确定需要距离眼镜的 60%的人没有自我报告需求。相反,在印度,75%自我报告需要距离眼镜的人根据临床损伤评估不需要。
在两个中低收入环境中,三种 AP 的需求很高,但覆盖范围很低。方法上的缺点突出表明,需要改进与国际功能、残疾和健康分类兼容的调查方法,以估计 AP 和相关服务的人口需求,为宣传和规划提供信息。