Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0242147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242147. eCollection 2020.
The aim of time-varying heart rate variability spectral analysis is to detect and quantify changes in the heart rate variability spectrum components during nonstationary events. Of the methods available, the nonparametric short-time Fourier Transform and parametric time-varying autoregressive modeling are the most commonly employed. The current study (1) compares short-time Fourier Transform and autoregressive modeling methods influence on heart rate variability spectral characteristics over time and during an experimental ozone exposure in mature adult spontaneously hypertensive rats, (2) evaluates the agreement between short-time Fourier Transform and autoregressive modeling method results, and (3) describes the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Although similar trends were detected during ozone exposure, statistical comparisons identified significant differences between short-time Fourier Transform and autoregressive modeling analysis results. Significant differences were observed between methods for LF power (p ≤ 0.014); HF power (p ≤ 0.011); total power (p ≤ 0.027); and normalized HF power (p = 0.05). Furthermore, inconsistencies between exposure-related observations accentuated the lack of agreement between short-time Fourier Transform and autoregressive modeling overall. Thus, the short-time Fourier Transform and autoregressive modeling methods for time-varying heart rate variability analysis could not be considered interchangeable for evaluations with or without interventions that are known to affect cardio-autonomic activity.
时变心率变异性谱分析的目的是检测和量化非平稳事件期间心率变异性谱分量的变化。在可用的方法中,非参数短时傅里叶变换和参数时变自回归建模是最常用的方法。本研究(1)比较了短时傅里叶变换和自回归建模方法对成熟成年自发性高血压大鼠实验性臭氧暴露期间心率变异性谱特征的影响,(2)评估了短时傅里叶变换和自回归建模方法结果之间的一致性,(3)描述了每种方法的优缺点。尽管在臭氧暴露期间检测到了相似的趋势,但统计比较确定了短时傅里叶变换和自回归建模分析结果之间存在显著差异。LF 功率(p≤0.014);HF 功率(p≤0.011);总功率(p≤0.027);和归一化 HF 功率(p=0.05)之间存在显著差异。此外,暴露相关观察结果之间的不一致突出表明,对于已知会影响心脏自主活动的干预措施或无干预措施的评估,短时傅里叶变换和自回归建模方法不能互换使用。