115144 Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.
University College London Medical School, London, England.
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jan/Feb;136(1):79-87. doi: 10.1177/0033354920964156. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
Childcare is an important setting for nutrition; nearly half of young children in the United States participate in licensed childcare, where they consume up to two-thirds of their daily dietary intake. We compared state regulations for childcare with best practices to support breastfeeding and healthy beverage provision.
We reviewed regulations for childcare centers (centers) and family childcare homes (homes) in effect May-July 2016 and rated all 50 states for inclusion (1 = not included, 2 = partially included, 3 = fully included) of 12 breastfeeding and beverage best practices. We calculated average ratings for 6 practices specific to infants aged 0-11 months, 6 practices specific to children aged 1-6 years, and all 12 practices, by state and across all states. We assessed significant differences between centers and homes for each best practice by using McNemar-Bowker tests for symmetry, and we assessed differences across states by using paired student tests.
States included best practices in regulations for centers more often than for homes. Average ratings (standard deviations) in regulations across all states were significantly higher in centers than in homes for infant best practices (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.5], < .001), child best practices (2.1 [0.6] vs 1.8 [0.6], = .002), and all 12 best practices combined (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.6], < .001).
Although best practices were more consistently included in regulations for centers than for homes, many state childcare regulations did not include best practices to support breastfeeding and the provision of healthy beverages. Findings can be used to inform efforts to improve regulations and to reduce differences between centers and homes.
儿童保育是营养的重要环境;近一半的美国幼儿在有照护儿童的保育中心(中心)接受照护,在那里他们摄入了日常饮食的三分之二以上。我们将儿童保育中心(中心)和家庭儿童保育之家(家庭)的州法规与支持母乳喂养和提供健康饮料的最佳做法进行了比较。
我们审查了 2016 年 5 月至 7 月生效的儿童保育中心(中心)和家庭儿童保育之家(家庭)的法规,并对所有 50 个州进行了分类(1=未包括,2=部分包括,3=完全包括)12 项母乳喂养和饮料最佳做法。我们根据州和所有州计算了 6 项针对 0-11 个月大婴儿的特定实践、6 项针对 1-6 岁儿童的特定实践以及所有 12 项实践的平均评分。我们使用麦克内马尔-鲍克检验来检验每种最佳实践在中心和家庭之间的对称性差异,并使用配对学生 t 检验来检验各州之间的差异。
州法规中纳入了中心的最佳做法比家庭的更频繁。所有州的中心法规的平均评分(标准差)显著高于家庭(婴儿最佳做法:2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.5], <.001;儿童最佳做法:2.1 [0.6] vs 1.8 [0.6], =.002;所有 12 项最佳做法的总和:2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.6], <.001)。
尽管中心的法规更一致地纳入了最佳做法,但许多州的儿童保育法规并未包括支持母乳喂养和提供健康饮料的最佳做法。研究结果可用于指导改善法规和减少中心与家庭之间差异的工作。