Nutrition Policy Institute, Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, 1111 Franklin Street, Eleventh Floor, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.
CACFP Roundtable, San Diego, CA 92172, USA.
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 25;16(19):3241. doi: 10.3390/nu16193241.
The U.S. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) provides tiered reimbursements for healthy foods for children at participating family childcare homes (FCCH). Higher tier 1 reimbursements are for providers who operate in low-income communities or who are themselves living on a low income. All FCCHs received a higher rate to address food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was administered in the spring of 2023 to a randomly selected sample of licensed California FCCHs to assess the perceived impacts of the increased reimbursement on CACFP participation and anticipated challenges with reinstated tiered rates. A total of 518 surveys (261 tier 1, 257 tier 2) were analyzed using linear or logistic regression, adjusting for confounders. Among tier 1 and tier 2 providers combined, over half reported lowering out-of-pocket spending for food (59%) and serving greater variety (55%) and quality (54%) of foods. Tier 2 providers reported experiencing more benefits ( < 0.05) and tended to be more likely to implement optional CACFP best practices (although not significantly different between tiers). Most FCCH providers found reimbursement rates were inadequate before (83%) the pandemic; this amount decreased to 54% post-pandemic for tier 1 and tier 2 providers combined. The temporary CACFP reimbursement positively impacted the perceived quality and variety of foods served to children, especially among tier 2 providers. Increased reimbursements for all FCCHs may ensure children have access to the healthy meals and snacks provided by the CACFP.
美国儿童和成人照顾食品计划 (CACFP) 为参与家庭儿童保育家庭 (FCCH) 的儿童提供健康食品的分层报销。较高的第 1 层报销是为在低收入社区运营或自身收入较低的提供者提供的。所有 FCCH 在 COVID-19 大流行期间都获得了更高的费率以解决粮食不安全问题。2023 年春季,对加利福尼亚州随机选择的许可 FCCH 进行了一项调查,以评估增加报销对 CACFP 参与的感知影响以及对恢复分层费率的预期挑战。使用线性或逻辑回归分析了总共 518 份调查(261 份第 1 层,257 份第 2 层),并根据混杂因素进行了调整。在第 1 层和第 2 层提供者中,超过一半的人报告说减少了食品的自付费用(59%),并提供了更多种类(55%)和质量(54%)的食品。第 2 层提供者报告说体验到更多的好处(<0.05),并且更有可能实施可选的 CACFP 最佳实践(尽管在两个层次之间没有显着差异)。大多数 FCCH 提供者在大流行之前发现报销率不足(83%);对于第 1 层和第 2 层提供者而言,这一数字在大流行后下降到 54%。临时 CACFP 报销对儿童所食用食品的质量和种类产生了积极影响,尤其是对第 2 层提供者而言。所有 FCCH 的报销增加可能确保儿童能够获得 CACFP 提供的健康餐点和零食。