• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

树脂复合材料与六种用于乳牙的盖髓材料的剪切粘结强度。

Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Six Pulp Capping Materials Used in Primary Teeth.

作者信息

Alhowaish Latifa, Salama Fouad, Al-Harbi Mohammed, Abumoatti Mohamad

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Aug 1;44(4):234-239. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.4.4.

DOI:10.17796/1053-4625-44.4.4
PMID:33167015
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure types of a resin-composite to six pulp-capping materials used in primary teeth.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight-disc specimens from each pulp-capping material (6 groups) to bond to Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable using a standard PVC tube (2×2mm). All groups were prepared according to the instruction of the manufacturer. The SBS was measured with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min using a universal testing machine. Failure mode evaluation was completed using Digital Microscope by two independent examiners.

RESULTS

Urbical LC® showed the highest SBS (Mean±SD) followed by ProRoot® MTA and TheraCal LC® (35.422±2.910, 22.114±2.515, and 21.175±1.983) respectively. ANOVA showed significant differences between all groups (P=0.0001). Urbical LC® and Photac™ Fil QuickAplicap™ were statistically significant different from all other pulp-capping materials groups. ProRoot® MTA was statistically significant different than Biodentine® (P=0.0001) and Photac™ Fil (P=0.0001). The total number of bond failure was recorded for cohesive B failure/cohesive in the pulp-capping material (14) and adhesive failure (14).

CONCLUSION

Most of the tested pulp-capping materials bonded to Filtek™ Z350 XT demonstrated clinically acceptable and high SBS. Urbical LC showed the highest SBS while Biodentine® showed the lowest SBS.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在评估树脂复合材料与六种用于乳牙的盖髓材料之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)及粘结失败类型。

研究设计

从每种盖髓材料(6组)制备八个圆盘标本,使用标准PVC管(2×2mm)与Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable粘结。所有组均按照制造商的说明制备。使用万能试验机以0.5mm/min的十字头速度测量SBS。由两名独立检查人员使用数字显微镜完成失败模式评估。

结果

Urbical LC®显示出最高的SBS(平均值±标准差),其次是ProRoot® MTA和TheraCal LC®(分别为35.422±2.910、22.114±2.515和21.175±1.983)。方差分析显示所有组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.0001)。Urbical LC®和Photac™ Fil QuickAplicap™与所有其他盖髓材料组在统计学上有显著差异。ProRoot® MTA与Biodentine®(P = 0.0001)和Photac™ Fil(P = 0.0001)在统计学上有显著差异。记录到盖髓材料中粘结失败的总数为内聚性B失败/内聚性(14例)和粘结失败(14例)。

结论

大多数测试的盖髓材料与Filtek™ Z350 XT粘结后显示出临床上可接受的高SBS。Urbical LC显示出最高的SBS,而Biodentine®显示出最低的SBS。

相似文献

1
Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Six Pulp Capping Materials Used in Primary Teeth.树脂复合材料与六种用于乳牙的盖髓材料的剪切粘结强度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Aug 1;44(4):234-239. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.4.4.
2
Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems.使用不同粘结系统时新型光固化硅酸钙基水门汀与树脂复合材料的剪切粘结强度
Dent Mater J. 2016 Dec 1;35(6):881-887. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-075. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
3
Comparison of shear bond strength of light cure mineral trioxide aggregate and light cure calcium hydroxide with nanofilled composite: A stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscope analysis.光固化三氧化矿物凝聚体和光固化氢氧化钙与纳米复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较:立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分析
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):56-63. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_178_19.
4
[Influence of setting time on bond strength of different bioactive pulp capping materials with dental adhesive].凝固时间对不同生物活性盖髓材料与牙科粘合剂粘结强度的影响
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Feb 18;50(1):58-62.
5
Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin.生物诱导腔衬对牙本质与牙复合树脂粘结剪切强度的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 18;2022:3283211. doi: 10.1155/2022/3283211. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of the shear bond strength between metal brackets and Transbond™ XT, Filtek™ Z250 and Filtek™ Z350 before and after gastroesophageal reflux: An in vitro study.胃食管反流前后金属托槽与 Transbond™ XT、Filtek™ Z250 和 Filtek™ Z350 之间的抗剪粘接强度比较:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Sep;20(3):100664. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100664. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
7
Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine.不同修复材料与三氧化矿物凝聚体和生物陶瓷的剪切粘结强度。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):292-296. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_97_17.
8
In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents.可流动复合树脂和单组分玻璃离子与三种不同盖髓剂的剪切粘结强度的体外比较。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Jul-Sep;56(3):239-244. doi: 10.17219/dmp/109233.
9
Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate.不同修复材料与光固化三氧化矿物凝聚体的粘结强度
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Winter;39(2):143-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.84x57tp110k46183.
10
Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Four Bioceramic Materials with Different Restorative Materials and Timings.四种生物陶瓷材料与不同修复材料及不同时间的剪切粘结强度评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 3;15(13):4668. doi: 10.3390/ma15134668.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Four Bioceramic Materials with Different Restorative Materials and Timings.四种生物陶瓷材料与不同修复材料及不同时间的剪切粘结强度评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 3;15(13):4668. doi: 10.3390/ma15134668.
2
Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.黏附系统与硅酸钙基材料的黏结强度:体外研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Gels. 2022 May 18;8(5):311. doi: 10.3390/gels8050311.