Suppr超能文献

经股动脉到经桡动脉入路行左心室心肌内膜活检的安全性和可行性。

The Safety and Feasibility of Transitioning From Transfemoral to Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy.

机构信息

St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W. Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Dec;32(12):E349-E354. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00243. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (LVEMB) is commonly performed via the transfemoral route. Radial access may help reduce vascular access complications, but there are few data on the safety and feasibility of transradial LVEMB.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the safety and feasibility of transitioning from transfemoral to transradial access LVEMB.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. Fifty procedures in 49 patients were included, 25 (50%) via the femoral route and 25 (50%) via the radial route.

RESULTS

The cohort had a mean age of 47 ± 13 years and the most common indication for LVEMB was myocarditis. From June 2015 until September 2016, all procedures (n = 21) were performed via the femoral approach; thenceforth, there was a gradual transition to the radial approach. More tissue samples were obtained when the procedure was performed via the femoral approach (P<.01). The minimum sampling target of 3 specimens was not met in 4 patients (16%) via the radial approach and in 1 patient (4%) via the femoral approach. Complications occurred in 3/25 transradial procedures (12%; 2 cardiac perforations and 1 forearm hematoma) and 3/25 transfemoral procedures (12%; 1 cardiac perforation, 1 femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, and 1 ventricular fibrillation). Cardiac perforations via the transradial approach occurred during the early transition period. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Transradial LVEMB is feasible, with a similar complication profile to femoral procedures, but associated with a smaller number of specimens. Transitioning from transfemoral to transradial procedures may initially be associated with a higher risk of complications and potentially a lower diagnostic yield.

摘要

背景

左心室心肌内膜活检(LVEMB)通常通过经股动脉途径进行。桡动脉入路可能有助于减少血管入路并发症,但关于经桡动脉 LVEMB 的安全性和可行性的数据很少。

目的

描述从经股动脉途径向经桡动脉途径过渡进行 LVEMB 的安全性和可行性。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。共纳入 49 例患者的 50 例次手术,其中 25 例(50%)经股动脉入路,25 例(50%)经桡动脉入路。

结果

该队列的平均年龄为 47±13 岁,LVEMB 的最常见适应证是心肌炎。2015 年 6 月至 2016 年 9 月,所有手术(n=21)均经股动脉入路进行;此后,逐渐过渡到经桡动脉入路。经股动脉入路时获得的组织样本更多(P<.01)。经桡动脉入路有 4 例(16%)和经股动脉入路有 1 例(4%)未达到 3 个样本的最小取样目标。25 例经桡动脉入路的手术中有 3 例(12%;2 例心脏穿孔和 1 例前臂血肿)和 25 例经股动脉入路的手术中有 3 例(12%;1 例心脏穿孔、1 例股动脉假性动脉瘤和 1 例心室颤动)发生并发症。经桡动脉入路的心脏穿孔发生在早期过渡阶段。无死亡病例。

结论

经桡动脉 LVEMB 是可行的,其并发症谱与股动脉手术相似,但获得的样本数量较少。从经股动脉途径向经桡动脉途径过渡可能最初与更高的并发症风险相关,并且潜在地具有更低的诊断率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验