Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死中心律失常的预后意义(作者译)

[Prognostic significance of arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction (author's transl)].

作者信息

Breithardt G, Seipel L, Loogen F

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1977 Jun;66(6):267-72.

PMID:331707
Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias represent a common precursor of ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction in man. Frequent ventricular ectopic beats (greater than 5/min), multifocal ectopic beats, ventricular bigeminy, ventricular salvoes, ventricular tachycardia, and the R-on-T phenomenon have been considered as warning arrhythmias. However, recent studies have given rise to some doubt concerning the value of warning arrhythmias as predictors of ventricular fibrillation. In many a case there is no warning arrhythmia prior to ventricular fibrillation or these arrhythmias do not fulfill the criteria of warning arrhythmias. In other cases the warning arrhythmias develop so briefly before ventricular fibrillation that no prophylactic measure can be instituted. Warning arrhythmias may occur at equal frequency in patients with and without consecutive ventricular fibrillation. This also applies to the R-on-T phenomenon as a warning arrhythmia and as the initiating mechanism of ventricular fibrillation. In nearly half the cases ventricular fibrillation is initiated by a late ventricular ectopic beat. In view of these data of the literature, the so-called warning arrhythmias seem to have lost their predictive value. They represent a common phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction in man. However, ventricular fibrillation may also occur without any prior ventricular arrhythmias, above all during the first day of acute myocardial infarction. The frequency of ventricular fibrillation decreases in the course of infarction. Therefore the time during acute myocardial infarction may be a better guide whether to institute prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy than the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. To date, the beneficial effect of prophylactic administration of lidocaine has remained controversial though a recent double-blind study has strongly suggested that lidocaine is able to prevent ventricular fibrillation. If these results should be confirmed by others, this would ask for routine administration of lidocaine in each case with acute myocardial infarction during the first day.

摘要

室性心律失常是人类急性心肌梗死中心室颤动的常见先兆。频发室性早搏(大于5次/分钟)、多源性早搏、室性二联律、室性连发、室性心动过速以及R波落在T波上现象均被视为警示性心律失常。然而,近期研究对警示性心律失常作为室颤预测指标的价值产生了一些质疑。在许多病例中,室颤发生前并无警示性心律失常,或者这些心律失常并不符合警示性心律失常的标准。在其他病例中,警示性心律失常在室颤前出现的时间极短,以至于无法采取预防措施。有无连续性室颤的患者出现警示性心律失常的频率可能相同。这同样适用于作为警示性心律失常以及室颤起始机制的R波落在T波上现象。近半数情况下,室颤由晚期室性早搏引发。鉴于文献中的这些数据,所谓的警示性心律失常似乎已失去其预测价值。它们是人类急性心肌梗死中的常见现象。然而,室颤也可能在无任何先前室性心律失常的情况下发生,尤其是在急性心肌梗死的第一天。室颤的发生率在梗死过程中会降低。因此,相较于室性心律失常的发生情况,急性心肌梗死期间的时间或许是决定是否采取预防性抗心律失常治疗的更好指标。迄今为止,利多卡因预防性给药的有益效果仍存在争议,尽管最近一项双盲研究强烈表明利多卡因能够预防室颤。如果这些结果能得到其他研究的证实,那么这将意味着在急性心肌梗死的第一天,应对每例患者常规使用利多卡因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验