Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 10;10(1):19445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76341-6.
Using histogram analysis of T2 values to detect early involvement of extraocular muscles (EOMs) in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). Five EOMs of each orbit were analyzed for 45 TAO patients and 22 healthy controls (HCs). Patients' EOMs were grouped into involved or normal-appearing EOMs (NAEOMs). Histogram parameters and signal intensity ratios (SIRs) of EOMs were compared; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to differentiate NAEOMs from EOMs of HCs. 24 patients were reassessed following immunosuppressive treatment. For SIRs, involved muscles showed higher values than those of NAEOMs and HCs (p < 0.05); there were no differences between NAEOMs and HCs (p = 0.26). Parameters of involved muscles showed no different from those of NAEOMs excluding 25th, 50th percentiles, and standard deviation (SD) (p < 0.05). NAEOMs displayed higher values of 90th, 95th percentiles, SD, skewness, inhomogeneity, and entropy than HCs (p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis of entropy yielded the best area under the ROC curve (AUC; 0.816) for differentiating NAEOMs and HCs. After treatment, histogram parameters including 5th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles, SD, kurtosis, inhomogeneity, and entropy were reduced in NAEOMs (p < 0.05). T2 histogram analysis could detect early involvement of EOMs in TAO prior to detection on conventional orbital MRI.
利用 T2 值直方图分析检测甲状腺相关眼病(TAO)患者眼外肌(EOM)的早期受累。对 45 例 TAO 患者和 22 例健康对照者(HC)的每只眼眶的 5 条 EOM 进行分析。将患者的 EOM 分为受累的和正常外观的 EOM(NAEOM)。比较 EOM 的直方图参数和信号强度比(SIR);进行接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析以区分 NAEOM 与 HC 的 EOM。24 例患者在免疫抑制治疗后进行了重新评估。对于 SIR,受累肌肉的数值高于 NAEOM 和 HC(p<0.05);NAEOM 和 HC 之间无差异(p=0.26)。除 25 百分位数、50 百分位数和标准差(SD)外,受累肌肉的参数与 NAEOM 无差异(p<0.05)。NAEOM 的 90 百分位数、95 百分位数、SD、偏度、不均匀性和熵值高于 HC(p<0.05)。熵的 ROC 曲线分析得出区分 NAEOM 和 HC 的最佳 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC;0.816)。治疗后,NAEOM 的直方图参数包括第 5、75、90 和 95 百分位数、SD、峰度、不均匀性和熵均降低(p<0.05)。T2 直方图分析可在常规眼眶 MRI 检测到 TAO 之前检测到 EOM 的早期受累。