Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of General Dentistry, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Han-Zhong Road 136th, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Odontology. 2021 Apr;109(2):496-505. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00564-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping characteristics of Protaper Universal (PTU; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Johnson City, TN), Hero Shaper (HS; MicroMega, Besacon, France) and Hyflex CM (HCM; Coltene-Whaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland) nickel-titanium systems with various apical sizes and tapers in second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal instrumentation using micro-computed tomographic imaging. A total of 27 maxillary first molars with independent patent MB2 canals were selected and randomly assigned to three groups according to the 3-dimensional morphologic aspects obtained from preoperative micro-computed tomographic scans. Canals were first negotiated with a size 8 K-file and finally prepared to F1, F2, and F3 with PTU and to sizes 20.04 taper, 25.04 taper, and 30.04 taper with HS and HCM. Postoperative scans were performed after each instrumentation with the same parameters used in the initial scan. The canal volume, canal transportation, untouched canal surface and wall thickness were measured and calculated using Mimics 10.01 software (Image Works, Materialise, Belgium). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance post hoc LSD tests. PTU removed more dentin than HS and HCM in all sections when instrumented to the same apical size (P < 0.05). HS and HCM presented a lower mean value of canal transportation than PTU in all measured sizes and sections. PTU presented a lower mean value of distal wall thickness than HS and HCM at the level of 1 and 2 mm below the furcation region in all measured sizes. In conclusion, for MB2 canal instrumentation, HS and HCM of 0.04 taper are safer than PTU.
本研究旨在通过微计算机断层扫描成像评估 Protaper Universal(PTU;Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties,Johnson City,TN)、Hero Shaper(HS;MicroMega,Besacon,France)和 Hyflex CM(HCM;Coltene-Whaledent,Allstetten,Switzerland)三种不同锥度和尖端直径的镍钛系统在第二近中颊根管(MB2)预备中的成形特征。选择了 27 颗具有独立 MB2 根管的上颌第一磨牙,根据术前微计算机断层扫描获得的三维形态学特征,随机分为三组。根管先用 8 K 锉疏通,然后分别用 PTU 预备至 F1、F2 和 F3,用 HS 和 HCM 预备至 20.04 锥度、25.04 锥度和 30.04 锥度。每次预备后,均用与初始扫描相同的参数进行术后扫描。使用 Mimics 10.01 软件(Image Works,Materialise,Belgium)测量和计算根管容积、根管偏移、未被器械切割的根管表面和管壁厚度。采用单因素方差分析和 LSD 检验进行统计学分析。当预备至相同的根尖尺寸时,PTU 比 HS 和 HCM 去除更多的牙本质(P < 0.05)。在所有测量的尺寸和节段中,HS 和 HCM 的根管偏移平均值均低于 PTU。在所有测量的尺寸中,PTU 在分叉下方 1 和 2 mm 处的远侧壁厚度平均值均低于 HS 和 HCM。结论:对于 MB2 根管预备,0.04 锥度的 HS 和 HCM 比 PTU 更安全。